Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3846 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3846.

History: L. 1996, ch. 267, § 3; L. 2006, ch. 194, § 21; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Conviction for defrauding the Medicaid program is affirmed to be supported with sufficient evidence. State v. McWilliams, 295 Kan. 92, 283 P.3d 187 (2012).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2018 · leading case: State v. McWilliams, 283 P.3d 187 (Kan. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McWilliams, 283 P.3d 187 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 5× “: This case requires us to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to support the bench trial conviction of Oliver McWilliams (McWilliams) under K.S.A. 21-3846(a)(l) for defrauding the Medicaid program.”
Mundy v. State (Kan. 2018). “After investigation, the State charged Mundy with six counts of making a false claim to the Medicaid program, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3846(a)(1); one count of obstructing a Medicaid fraud investigation, in violation of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3846(a)(1) — 1 case
Mundy v. State (Kan. 2018). “After investigation, the State charged Mundy with six counts of making a false claim to the Medicaid program, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3846(a)(1); one count of obstructing a Medicaid fraud investigation, in violation of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3846(a)(l) — 1 case
State v. McWilliams, 283 P.3d 187 (Kan. 2012). “: This case requires us to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to support the bench trial conviction of Oliver McWilliams (McWilliams) under K.S.A. 21-3846(a)(l) for defrauding the Medicaid program.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.