K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4624 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4624.

History: L. 1990, ch. 99, § 4; L. 1994, ch. 252, § 4; L. 2004, ch. 102, § 3; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 10; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 30, § 288; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 105 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: State v. Scott, 183 P.3d 801 (Kan. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Scott, 183 P.3d 801 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 64× “Conversely, if charged and convicted of one count of capital murder, only one hard 50 sentence could be imposed.”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 206× “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 42× “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Robinson, 363 P.3d 875 (Kan. 2015). · cites it 40× “Following the guilt phase trial, a separate sentencing proceeding was held pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4624(b). The penalty phase jury sentenced Robinson to death on each capital murder conviction and that sentence was imposed by the trial court.”
State v. Carr, 331 P.3d 544 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 14× “at 1078 ); see also K.S.A. 21-4624 (State expressly burdened with proving existence of aggravating circumstance beyond reasonable doubt; statute silent on standard of proof on mitigating circumstance).”
State v. Alford, 429 P.3d 197 (Kan. 2018). · cites it 12× “At the time Alford committed this offense of first-degree murder, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624 required the jury unanimously recommend the hard 40 sentence.”
Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006). · cites it 8× “Kan. Stat. Ann. §21-4624 (e) (1995). We must decide whether this statute, which requires the imposition of the death penalty when the sentencing jury determines that aggravating evidence and mitigating evidence are in equipoise, violates the Constitution.”
State v. Carr, 502 P.3d 546 (Kan. 2022). · cites it 18× “A. 21-4624). But Instruction No. 10 garbled this standard by introducing an extra "not" into the sentence: it instructed the jury to reject the death penalty if "one or more jurors is not persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravating circumstances .”
State v. Gideon, 894 P.2d 850 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 11× “*601 K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624(1), requiring that notice be timely given, does not detail what information must be contained in the notice.”
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). · cites it 2× “720, § 5/9-1(d) (West 1993); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4624 (b) (1995); Ky.”
State v. Peckham, 875 P.2d 257 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 12× “HARD-40 SENTENCE K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624 provides certain notice requirements before a mandatory term of imprisonment of 40 years can be imposed following a conviction for first-degree murder.”
State v. Bailey, 834 P.2d 342 (Kan. 1992). · cites it 9× “He also appeals the sentence of 40 years’ imprisonment imposed pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 21-4624. Two cases were consolidated for trial.”
Show all 105 citing cases →
K.S.A. § 21-4624(1): 22 cases
State v. White, 950 P.2d 1316 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Harris, 915 P.2d 758 (Kan. 1996).
State v. Deavers, 843 P.2d 695 (Kan. 1992).
State v. Richardson, 883 P.2d 1107 (Kan. 1994).
State v. Allison, 910 P.2d 817 (Kan. 1996).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(2): 10 cases
State v. Gideon, 894 P.2d 850 (Kan. 1995). “*601 K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624(1), requiring that notice be timely given, does not detail what information must be contained in the notice.”
State v. Harmon, 865 P.2d 1011 (Kan. 1993).
State v. Kingsley, 851 P.2d 370 (Kan. 1993).
State v. Phillips, 850 P.2d 877 (Kan. 1993).
State v. Bailey, 834 P.2d 342 (Kan. 1992). “He also appeals the sentence of 40 years’ imprisonment imposed pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 21-4624. Two cases were consolidated for trial.”
K.S.A. § 21-4624(3): 13 cases
State v. Alford, 429 P.3d 197 (Kan. 2018). “At the time Alford committed this offense of first-degree murder, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624 required the jury unanimously recommend the hard 40 sentence.”
State v. Gideon, 894 P.2d 850 (Kan. 1995). “*601 K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624(1), requiring that notice be timely given, does not detail what information must be contained in the notice.”
State v. Moncla, 936 P.2d 727 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Richardson, 883 P.2d 1107 (Kan. 1994).
State v. Kingsley, 851 P.2d 370 (Kan. 1993).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(4): 3 cases
State v. Harmon, 865 P.2d 1011 (Kan. 1993).
State v. Duke, 887 P.2d 110 (Kan. 1994).
State v. Perez, 840 P.2d 1118 (Kan. 1992).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(5): 15 cases
State v. Reed, 886 P.2d 854 (Kan. 1994).
State v. Alford, 429 P.3d 197 (Kan. 2018). “At the time Alford committed this offense of first-degree murder, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624 required the jury unanimously recommend the hard 40 sentence.”
State v. Gideon, 894 P.2d 850 (Kan. 1995). “*601 K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4624(1), requiring that notice be timely given, does not detail what information must be contained in the notice.”
State v. Moses, 127 P.3d 330 (Kan. 2006).
State v. Phillips, 850 P.2d 877 (Kan. 1993).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(6): 4 cases
State v. Follin, 947 P.2d 8 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Duke, 887 P.2d 110 (Kan. 1994).
State v. Allison, 582 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2026).
State v. Kingsley – Biles – Affirmed – Sedgwick, No. 114468 (Kan. June 2, 2017).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(a): 12 cases
State v. Scott, 183 P.3d 801 (Kan. 2008). “Conversely, if charged and convicted of one count of capital murder, only one hard 50 sentence could be imposed.”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
State v. Carr, 331 P.3d 544 (Kan. 2014). “at 1078 ); see also K.S.A. 21-4624 (State expressly burdened with proving existence of aggravating circumstance beyond reasonable doubt; statute silent on standard of proof on mitigating circumstance).”
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Thurber, 420 P.3d 389 (Kan. 2018).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(b): 7 cases
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Robinson, 363 P.3d 875 (Kan. 2015). “Following the guilt phase trial, a separate sentencing proceeding was held pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4624(b). The penalty phase jury sentenced Robinson to death on each capital murder conviction and that sentence was imposed by the trial court.”
State v. Cheever, 284 P.3d 1007 (Kan. 2012).
State v. Kleypas, No. 101724 (Kan. Oct. 21, 2016).
K.S.A. § 21-4624(c): 14 cases
State v. Scott, 183 P.3d 801 (Kan. 2008). “Conversely, if charged and convicted of one count of capital murder, only one hard 50 sentence could be imposed.”
State v. Carr, 331 P.3d 544 (Kan. 2014). “at 1078 ); see also K.S.A. 21-4624 (State expressly burdened with proving existence of aggravating circumstance beyond reasonable doubt; statute silent on standard of proof on mitigating circumstance).”
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Carr, 502 P.3d 546 (Kan. 2022). “A. 21-4624). But Instruction No. 10 garbled this standard by introducing an extra "not" into the sentence: it instructed the jury to reject the death penalty if "one or more jurors is not persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravating circumstances .”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
K.S.A. § 21-4624(d): 1 case
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
K.S.A. § 21-4624(e): 23 cases
State v. Scott, 183 P.3d 801 (Kan. 2008). “Conversely, if charged and convicted of one count of capital murder, only one hard 50 sentence could be imposed.”
State v. Robinson, 363 P.3d 875 (Kan. 2015). “Following the guilt phase trial, a separate sentencing proceeding was held pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4624(b). The penalty phase jury sentenced Robinson to death on each capital murder conviction and that sentence was imposed by the trial court.”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Carr, 502 P.3d 546 (Kan. 2022). “A. 21-4624). But Instruction No. 10 garbled this standard by introducing an extra "not" into the sentence: it instructed the jury to reject the death penalty if "one or more jurors is not persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravating circumstances .”
K.S.A. § 21-4624(f): 4 cases
State v. Stallings, 163 P.3d 1232 (Kan. 2007). “STANDARD OF REVIEW In Kansas, allocution in general is governed by statute. See K.”
State v. Robinson, 363 P.3d 875 (Kan. 2015). “Following the guilt phase trial, a separate sentencing proceeding was held pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4624(b). The penalty phase jury sentenced Robinson to death on each capital murder conviction and that sentence was imposed by the trial court.”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3439; K.S.A. 21-4624. This case represents the first court *909 challenge under the enactment.”
State v. Marsh, 102 P.3d 445 (Kan. 2004).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.