K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4705 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4705.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 5; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 255; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 51; L. 1994, ch. 338, § 9; L. 1996, ch. 258, § 11; L. 1997, ch. 181, § 3; L. 1999, ch. 170, § 1; L. 2003, ch. 135, § 4; L. 2008, ch. 183, § 5; L. 2009, ch. 132, § 11; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: State v. Moore, 181 P.3d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bell, 561 P.3d 562 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “During sentencing of Case 1, the trial court doubled his sentence under K.S.A. 21-4705(e) (now K.S.A. 21-6805[e]), using Case 2 to elevate the conviction in Case 1 as a second conviction.”
State v. Ewing (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Wetrich, 412 P.3d 984 (Kan. 2018). “K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 21-4704 (nondrug offense grid); K.”
State v. Barnes, 430 P.3d 490 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
Harms v. Cline, 27 F. Supp. 3d 1173 (D. Kan. 2014). · cites it 2× “Thus neither the state court’s interpretation of K.S.A. § 21-4705 (now repealed) nor Petitioner’s sentence thereunder violates the clearly established Supreme Court precedent of Apprendi or Cunningham .”
State v. Alonzo, 297 P.3d 300 (Kan. 2013). “Before the Court of Appeals, Alonzo challenged the district court’s jurisdiction to resentence him because, according to Alonzo, he had already completed the only portion of his original sentence that was legal—the 12-month presumptive probation term under K.S.A. 2004 Supp.…”
State v. Hopkins, 285 P.3d 1021 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 2× “the defendant shall be subject to revocation of probation and the defendant shall serve the underlying sentence as established *584 in K.S.A. 21-4705 [sentencing guidelines grid for drug crimes] and amendments thereto.”
United States v. Rivers, 495 F. App'x 915 (10th Cir. 2012).
State v. McKnight, 257 P.3d 339 (Kan. 2011). “To reach this conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied upon K.S.A. 21-4705(c)(2), which states: “In presumptive imprisonment cases, the sentencing court shall pronounce the complete sentence which shall include the prison sentence, the maximum potential reduction to such sentence…”
State v. Perry-Coutcher, 254 P.3d 556 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). “See K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 21-4705. The sentencing hearing in this case, which was held approximately 1 week after the sentencing hearing in the forgery case, went much the same as the prior hearing.”
State v. England, 245 P.3d 1076 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “21-4704 and the sentencing grid for drug crimes as provided in K.S.A. 21-4705 shall be applied for crimes committed before July 1, 1993, as provided in this section.”
Show all 56 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(a) — 13 cases
State v. Paul, 175 P.3d 840 (Kan. 2008).
State v. Ford, 936 P.2d 255 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Roseborough, 951 P.2d 532 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Overton, 112 P.3d 244 (Kan. 2005).
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(b) — 1 case
State v. Paul, 175 P.3d 840 (Kan. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(c) — 4 cases
State v. Delacruz, 899 P.2d 1042 (Kan. 1995).
State v. Roseborough, 951 P.2d 532 (Kan. 1997).
Comer v. State, 942 P.2d 658 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Hackler, 898 P.2d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(c)(2) — 1 case
State v. McKnight, 257 P.3d 339 (Kan. 2011). “To reach this conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied upon K.S.A. 21-4705(c)(2), which states: “In presumptive imprisonment cases, the sentencing court shall pronounce the complete sentence which shall include the prison sentence, the maximum potential reduction to such sentence…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(c)(l) — 1 case
Abasolo v. State, 160 P.3d 471 (Kan. 2007).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(d) — 4 cases
State v. Martin, 17 P.3d 344 (Kan. 2001).
State v. Reason, 951 P.2d 538 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Ford, 936 P.2d 255 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Standifer, 946 P.2d 637 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(d)(2) — 1 case
Phillpot v. Shelton, 875 P.2d 289 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(e) — 3 cases
State v. Moore, 181 P.3d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Unruh, 177 P.3d 411 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Bell, 561 P.3d 562 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). “During sentencing of Case 1, the trial court doubled his sentence under K.S.A. 21-4705(e) (now K.S.A. 21-6805[e]), using Case 2 to elevate the conviction in Case 1 as a second conviction.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(f) — 3 cases
State v. Andelt, 217 P.3d 976 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(f)(2) — 1 case
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
— K.S.A. § 21-4705(f)(l) — 1 case
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.