Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 25-4321 (2026)
Same; certain acts crimes
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
25-4321. Same; certain acts crimes. Any person who signs a name other than that person's own name to a petition for recall of a local officer, or who knowingly signs more than once for the same proposition at one election, or who signs the petition knowing he or she is not a registered elector is guilty of a class B misdemeanor. Each page of the petition shall include a statement of warning of this crime.
History: L. 1976, ch. 178, § 21; L. 1976, ch. 176, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 147, § 5; April 25.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–2001 · leading case: Eveleigh v. Conness, 933 P.2d 675 (Kan. 1997).
Eveleigh v. Conness, 933 P.2d 675 (Kan. 1997). “ibed in particular in not more than 200 words; (3) a statement that the petitioners are registered electors of the election district of the local officer sought to be recalled; (4) the names and addresses of three registered electors of the election district of the officer…”
Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987). “ar in not more than two hundred (200) words, (3) a statement that the petitioners are registered electors of the election district of the local officer sought to be recalled, (4) the names and addresses of three (3) registered electors of the election district of the officer…”
Cline v. Tittel, 891 P.2d 1137 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “ibed in particular in not more than 200 words; (3) a statement that the petitioners are registered electors of the election district of tire local officer sought to be recalled; (4) the names and addresses of three registered electors of the election district of the officer…”
Reynolds v. Figge, 19 P.3d 193 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “25-4320(b) and K.S.A. 25-4321. Specifically, appellants contend that the petitions filed against them are not sufficient because each page of the petitions do not contain the required warning and, thus, are not in the proper form.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.