Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1555 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1555.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 43; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 14 cases, 1983–2008 · leading case: In the Interest of B.D.-Y., 187 P.3d 594 (Kan. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In the Interest of B.D.-Y., 187 P.3d 594 (Kan. 2008). “K.S.A. 38-1555 (now repealed and reenacted as K.”

In the Interest of J.A.H., 172 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “was a child in *387 need of care as required by K.S.A. 38-1555. That statute provides: “In ah proceedings on a petition alleging that a child is a child in need of care, the petitioner or the state must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the child is a child in need of…”

In the Interest of J.D.C., 159 P.3d 974 (Kan. 2007). “K.S.A. 38-1555 (now repealed and reenacted as K.”

In the Interest of M.M.L., 900 P.2d 813 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 38-1555; K.S.A. 38-1556. K.S.A. 1994 Supp.”

In Re Interest of Sawyer, 672 P.2d 1093 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 38-1555. While this is the burden of proof at trial, “the duty of the appellate court extends only to a search of the record for the purpose of determining whether there is any competent substantial evidence to support the findings .”

In the Interest of A.F., 172 P.3d 66 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). “K.S.A. 38-1555 (replaced by K.S.A. 2006 Supp.”

In re S.M.H., 103 P.3d 976 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “In contrast, K.S.A. 38-1555 requires the petitioner, or the State, to “prove by clear and convincing evidence that the child is a child in need of care.”

In the Interest of A.B., 746 P.2d 96 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “are children in need of care is not supported by the clear and convincing evidence requirement of K.S.A. 38-1555. An orthopedic surgeon testified that, when admitted to the hospital, E.”

In Re Jah, 172 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “was a child in need of care as required by K.S.A. 38-1555. That statute provides: "In all proceedings on a petition alleging that a child is a child in need of care, the petitioner or the state must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the child is a child in need of care.”

In Re Bd-Y., 187 P.3d 594 (Kan. 2008). “K.S.A. 38-1555 (now repealed and reenacted as K.”

In Re Jdc, 159 P.3d 974 (Kan. 2007). “K.S.A. 38-1555 (now repealed and reenacted as K.”

In Re Smh, 103 P.3d 976 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “In contrast, K.S.A. 38-1555 requires the petitioner, or the State, to "prove by clear and convincing evidence that the child is a child in need of care.”

Show all 14 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.