K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1565 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1565.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 49; L. 1985, ch. 145, § 2; L. 1987, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 122, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 148, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 301, § 5; L. 1998, ch. 139, § 5; L. 1999, ch. 156, § 9; L. 2000, ch. 150, § 14; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1987–2003 · leading case: In the Interest of M.M., 873 P.2d 1371 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Interest of M.M., 873 P.2d 1371 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 9× “Dorothy argues that the trial court erred in its determination of her unfitness, that the trial court did not evaluate parental fitness as defined by law, and that the court improperly terminated her parental rights without regard to the requirements set forth in K.S.A. 38-1565.…”
In the Interest of M.M.L., 900 P.2d 813 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 38-1565(a). Progress reports are to be submitted to the court at least every six months, and a hearing shall be held if the court determines the progress is inadequate or the goals are no longer viable.”
In re T.S., 74 P.3d 1009 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 5× ““The only place that becomes specific is K.S.A. 38-1565, which is actually the first statute that talks about if we have a disposition and the child is taken away from whatever, how do we integrate it — reintegrate the child into whatever.”
In re D.D.P., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 5× “The district court ordered the preparation of the plan under authority of K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 38-1565, which provides: “(a) If a child is placed outside the child’s home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which…”
In the Interest of J. G., 734 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 38-1565(a) provides: “If a child is placed outside the child’s home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which provides for reintegration of the child into the child’s family or, if reintegration is not a…”
In the Interest of M.E.B., 29 P.3d 471 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “38-1561; K.S.A. 38-1565; K.S.A. 38-1584. The legislature has recognized that reintegration with a parent may not be viable if the child has been *691 in extended out-of-home placement.”
In the interest of Phillips, 806 A.2d 616 (Del. Fm. Ct. 2002). “22, § 4036 (2002); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-1565 (2001); N.H.Rev.”
In the Interest of C.C., 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1565(a). “ ‘Extended out of home placement’ means a child has been in the custody of the secretary and placed with neither parent for 15 of the most recent 22 months beginning 60 days after the date at which a child in the custody of the secretary was…”
In re A.P., 961 P.2d 706 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “K.S.A. 1997 Supp. 38-1565. Unlike the grounds for termination, the specific requirements of these plans are left largely to the case-by-case determination of need assessment.”
In the Interest of J.D., 70 P.3d 700 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “The resulting journal entry recited that it had been held pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1565 and K.S.A. 38-1584. Again, an SRS representative had been present at the hearing.”
In Re Ddp, Jr., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 5× “The district court ordered the preparation of the plan under authority of K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 38-1565, which provides: "(a) If a child is placed outside the child's home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which…”
In Re Jg, 734 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 38-1565(a) provides: "If a child is placed outside the child's home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which provides for reintegration of the child into the child's family or, if reintegration is not a…”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 38-1565(a) — 8 cases
In the Interest of J. G., 734 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “K.S.A. 38-1565(a) provides: “If a child is placed outside the child’s home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which provides for reintegration of the child into the child’s family or, if reintegration is not a…”
In the Interest of M.M.L., 900 P.2d 813 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 38-1565(a). Progress reports are to be submitted to the court at least every six months, and a hearing shall be held if the court determines the progress is inadequate or the goals are no longer viable.”
In re T.S., 74 P.3d 1009 (Kan. 2003). ““The only place that becomes specific is K.S.A. 38-1565, which is actually the first statute that talks about if we have a disposition and the child is taken away from whatever, how do we integrate it — reintegrate the child into whatever.”
In the Interest of C.C., 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1565(a). “ ‘Extended out of home placement’ means a child has been in the custody of the secretary and placed with neither parent for 15 of the most recent 22 months beginning 60 days after the date at which a child in the custody of the secretary was…”
In Re Jg, 734 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “K.S.A. 38-1565(a) provides: "If a child is placed outside the child's home and no plan is made a part of the record of the dispositional hearing, a written plan shall be prepared which provides for reintegration of the child into the child's family or, if reintegration is not a…”
— K.S.A. § 38-1565(a)(6) — 2 cases
In the Interest of M.E.B., 29 P.3d 471 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “38-1561; K.S.A. 38-1565; K.S.A. 38-1584. The legislature has recognized that reintegration with a parent may not be viable if the child has been *691 in extended out-of-home placement.”
In Re Meb, 29 P.3d 471 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
— K.S.A. § 38-1565(b) — 2 cases
In the Interest of M.M.L., 900 P.2d 813 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 38-1565(a). Progress reports are to be submitted to the court at least every six months, and a hearing shall be held if the court determines the progress is inadequate or the goals are no longer viable.”
In Re Mml, 258 Kan. 254 (Kan. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 38-1565(c) — 2 cases
In the Interest of M.M., 873 P.2d 1371 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “Dorothy argues that the trial court erred in its determination of her unfitness, that the trial court did not evaluate parental fitness as defined by law, and that the court improperly terminated her parental rights without regard to the requirements set forth in K.S.A. 38-1565.…”
In Re Mm, 873 P.2d 1371 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.