Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1587 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1587.

History: L. 1999, ch. 156, § 3; L. 2000, ch. 150, § 21; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Parent seeking appointment of permanent guardian of children must first request to be found unfit as parent. In re C.C., 29 Kan. App. 2d 950, 34 P.3d 462 (2001).

2. Cited; consensual appointment of permanent guardian under K.S.A. 38-1587 does not terminate parent's obligation to support child. State ex rel. Secretary of SRS v. Bohrer, 286 Kan. 898, 902, 906, 915, 916, 920, 189 P.3d 1157 (2008).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2001–2008 · leading case: State ex rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 6× “The statutes provided for three different methods of appointing a permanent guardian: (1) by parental consent (K.S.A. 38-1587); (2) after a finding of unfitness but without a termination of parental rights (K.”
State of Kan. Ex Rel. Sec. of Srs v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 6× “The statutes provided for three different methods of appointing a permanent guardian: (1) by parental consent (K.S.A. 38-1587); (2) after a finding of unfitness but without a termination of parental rights (K.”
In the Interest of C.C., 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1587(a). However, it is apparent that the “agreement of the parents” language in the CINC code is designed to provide an expeditious means to effect a permanent custody when all parties agree that permanent guardianship is in the best interests of the…”
In Re Cc, 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “" K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1587(a). However, it is apparent that the "agreement of the parents" language in the CINC code is designed to provide an expeditious means to effect a permanent custody when all parties agree that permanent guardianship is in the best interests of the…”
— K.S.A. § 38-1587(a) — 2 cases
In the Interest of C.C., 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1587(a). However, it is apparent that the “agreement of the parents” language in the CINC code is designed to provide an expeditious means to effect a permanent custody when all parties agree that permanent guardianship is in the best interests of the…”
In Re Cc, 34 P.3d 462 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “" K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 38-1587(a). However, it is apparent that the "agreement of the parents" language in the CINC code is designed to provide an expeditious means to effect a permanent custody when all parties agree that permanent guardianship is in the best interests of the…”
— K.S.A. § 38-1587(b) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008). “The statutes provided for three different methods of appointing a permanent guardian: (1) by parental consent (K.S.A. 38-1587); (2) after a finding of unfitness but without a termination of parental rights (K.”
State of Kan. Ex Rel. Sec. of Srs v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008). “The statutes provided for three different methods of appointing a permanent guardian: (1) by parental consent (K.S.A. 38-1587); (2) after a finding of unfitness but without a termination of parental rights (K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.