K.S.A. » Chapter 50
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 50-601 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-601.

History: L. 1968, ch. 341, § 1; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 217, § 22; January 1, 1974.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Violation of assurance of discontinuance filed under K.S.A. 60-610 and approved by court held not court order; not punishable for contempt. State v. McPherson, 208 Kan. 511, 493 P.2d 228.

2. Term "merchandise" held not to include real estate. Hunter v. Haun, 210 Kan. 11, 14, 15, 499 P.2d 1087.

3. Act applied in action for misrepresentation and chain referral scheme. State, ex rel., Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 212 Kan. 668, 669, 512 P.2d 416.

4. Debt collection agency is "supplier" within meaning of Consumer Protection Act. State ex rel. Miller v. Midwest Service Bureau of Topeka, Inc., 229 Kan. 322, 323, 623 P.2d 1343.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2023 · leading case: Equitable Life Leasing Corp. v. Abbick, 757 P.2d 304 (Kan. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Equitable Life Leasing Corp. v. Abbick, 757 P.2d 304 (Kan. 1988). “: This is an action for violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA) (K.S.A. 50-601 et seq.), breach of contract, and common-law fraud brought by Marion Abbick against Moore Business Systems (Moore).”
Cooper v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 320 F. Supp. 2d 1154 (D. Kan. 2004). “1 Plaintiffs assert claims of strict liability, negligence, breach of implied and express warranties, loss of consortium, and a violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, Article 6, § 50-601 et seq. Defendants 2 removed the action to this court pursuant to 28 U.”
Alexander v. Certified Master Builders Corp., 1 P.3d 899 (Kan. 2000). “K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 50-601 et. seq. The legislature recognized the merit of encouraging consumers to pursue their rights and made provisions which allow actual damages or civil penalties, as well as costs and attorney fees for successful litigants.”
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Midwest Serv. Bureau of Topeka, Inc., 623 P.2d 1343 (Kan. 1981). “The KCPA is much broader than the former law and expands both the types of transactions covered and the persons protected.”
Gehring v. State, 886 P.2d 370 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “For example, we believe that a statute which does create liability is the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), K.S.A. 50-601 et seq. Because liability may be established without proving the intent to defraud, an action under the KCPA is distinguishable from a common-law fraud…”
Hunter v. Haun, 499 P.2d 1087 (Kan. 1972). · cites it 4× “: Plaintiffs-appellees brought this action to enjoin defendant-appellant, the county attorney of Morris County, from proceeding against them under the provisions of the Kansas Buyer Protection Act, K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 50-601, et seq., hereafter referred to as the act.”
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Price, 172 P.3d 561 (Kan. 2007). “" Commissioner Lively also concluded that Respondent David Martin Price and Respondent Pro Se Advocates had committed an unconscionable act in violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), K.S.A. 50-601 et seq., in their work for Theron Frost and had committed a…”
Tomes v. LoanCare, LLC (D. Kan. 2023). · cites it 2× “) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint bringing a claim for violation of the FCRA under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681e(b) and 1681(i); a claim for violation of the FCRA under 15 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.