Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 58-2259 (2026)

Recorded deeds executed pursuant to district or probate court proceedings in Dickinson county prior to January 17, 1882, validated; time for attacking

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

58-2259. Recorded deeds executed pursuant to district or probate court proceedings in Dickinson county prior to January 17, 1882, validated; time for attacking. Any deed executed by a sheriff, administrator, executor, guardian or other officer of the court pursuant to proceedings in the district court or probate court of Dickinson county, Kansas, prior to January 17, 1882, which deed has been recorded in the office of the register of deeds, is hereby confirmed and validated and the title conveyed by any such deed is hereby declared to be merchantable to the extent of the interest therein conveyed: Provided, That any person desiring to present proof of the invalidity or partial invalidity of any such deed or of such proceedings shall have one year after the effective date of this act within which to bring proceedings attacking such deed or proceedings.

History: L. 1947, ch. 337, § 1; July 1.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Case & Assocs. Props. Inc. v. Bribiesca, 427 P.3d 987 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Case & Assocs. Props. Inc. v. Bribiesca, 427 P.3d 987 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “" She argues her options for relief were not limited to giving that notice and states she was concerned Case might prefer termination of the lease so it could leave the maintenance issues unresolved for the next tenant.”
— K.S.A. § 58-2259(a) — 1 case
Case & Assocs. Props. Inc. v. Bribiesca, 427 P.3d 987 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “" She argues her options for relief were not limited to giving that notice and states she was concerned Case might prefer termination of the lease so it could leave the maintenance issues unresolved for the next tenant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.