History:
L. 1965, ch. 347, § 18; L. 1983, ch. 191, § 14; L. 1983, ch. 192, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 211, § 36; L. 1993, ch. 193, § 3; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 114, § 81; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in holding incapacitated parent entitled to service on guardian and conservator (K.S.A. 60-304(c)) in severance proceedings. In re Baby Boy Bryant, 9 Kan. App. 2d 768, 773, 774, 689 P.2d 1203 (1984).
2. Cited; circumstances rendering order approving claims voidable due to conservator's substantial conflict of interest (K.S.A. 59-1703), "other interested parties" examined. In re Conservatorship of L.M.S., 12 Kan. App. 2d 725, 729, 755 P.2d 22 (1988).
3. Factors in addition to requirements in K.S.A. 59-3014, to be considered in appointment of guardian for minor determined. In re Guardianship of T.D.S., 13 Kan. App. 2d 275, 276, 769 P.2d 32 (1989).
4. Noted in holding provisions in K.S.A. 59-3010 mandatory not directory thus requiring compliance for jurisdiction regarding guardianship/conservatorship. In re Guardianship and Conservatorship of Fogle, 17 Kan. App. 2d 357, 361, 837 P.2d 842 (1992).
In the Interest of Baby Boy Bryant, 689 P.2d 1203 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2דK.S.A. 59-3018(a). That duty and power would include protecting and aiding the ward in a child severance proceeding brought to sever the ward’s parental rights to an illegitimate infant.”
In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Fogle, 837 P.2d 842 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2דOur reading of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 59-3018, in pari materia, leads us to conclude that the legislature expressed a different intent.”
In re the Guardianship of T.D.S., 769 P.2d 32 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 59-3018(b). Deciding who should be given this responsibility is one of the most important decisions that can be made for the minor during his or her minority.”
In Re the Conservatorship of L.M.S., 755 P.2d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “However, K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 59-3018 provides in part: “(b) The guardian of a minor shall be entitled to the custody and control of the ward and shall provide for the ward’s education, support and maintenance.”
In re the Est. of Steward, 79 P.3d 791 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2דK.S.A. 59-3018 provided: “It is the general duty of an individual or corporation appointed to serve as a guardian to carry out diligently and in good faith the specific duties and powers assigned by the court.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3018(a) — 3 cases
In the Interest of Baby Boy Bryant, 689 P.2d 1203 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “K.S.A. 59-3018(a). That duty and power would include protecting and aiding the ward in a child severance proceeding brought to sever the ward’s parental rights to an illegitimate infant.”
In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Fogle, 837 P.2d 842 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “Our reading of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 59-3018, in pari materia, leads us to conclude that the legislature expressed a different intent.”
In re the Est. of Steward, 79 P.3d 791 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “K.S.A. 59-3018 provided: “It is the general duty of an individual or corporation appointed to serve as a guardian to carry out diligently and in good faith the specific duties and powers assigned by the court.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3018(b) — 1 case
In re the Guardianship of T.D.S., 769 P.2d 32 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 59-3018(b). Deciding who should be given this responsibility is one of the most important decisions that can be made for the minor during his or her minority.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3018(g)(6) — 1 case
In the Interest of Baby Boy Bryant, 689 P.2d 1203 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “K.S.A. 59-3018(a). That duty and power would include protecting and aiding the ward in a child severance proceeding brought to sever the ward’s parental rights to an illegitimate infant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.