Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-6a213 (2026)

Waiver of right of election and other rights by surviving spouse; requirements; procedures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-6a213. Waiver of right of election and other rights by surviving spouse; requirements; procedures. (a) The right of election of a surviving spouse and the rights of the surviving spouse to the homestead, the homestead allowance or the family allowance, or all of them, may be waived, wholly or partially, before or after marriage, by a written contract, agreement, consent to any instrument, or waiver signed by the surviving spouse.

(b) A surviving spouse's waiver is not enforceable if the surviving spouse proves that:

(1) The surviving spouse did not execute the waiver voluntarily; or

(2) the waiver was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the waiver, the surviving spouse:

(A) Was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the decedent;

(B) did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the decedent beyond the disclosure provided; and

(C) did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the decedent.

(c) An issue of unconscionability of a waiver is for decision by the court as a matter of law.

(d) Unless it provides to the contrary, a waiver of "all rights," or equivalent language, in the property or estate of a present or prospective spouse or a complete property settlement entered into after or in anticipation of separation or divorce is a waiver of all rights of elective share benefits that would otherwise pass to such spouse from the other by intestate succession or by virtue of any will executed before the waiver or property settlement. For documents executed on and after July 1, 2002, to waive the homestead, the homestead allowance or the family allowance, or all of them, the language of the document must clearly provide that the homestead, the homestead allowance or the family allowance, or all of them, were understandably and knowledgeably waived by each spouse, if applicable.

History: L. 1994, ch. 132, § 13; L. 2002, ch. 135, § 3; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: In Re the Est. of Cross, 367 P.3d 298 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re the Est. of Cross, 367 P.3d 298 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 22× “The district court agreed with the Coexecutors, holding that Marilyn’s 1992 consent to Charles’ will constituted a waiver of the subsequently modified elective share rights under K.S.A. 59-6a213. Facts Charles and Marilyn were married on February 4, 1983, and were married for 26…”
Allison v. Sabin-Mitchell (Kan. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 7× “Dian appeals the district court's ruling, claiming the statutes that allow for premarital waiver of spousal homestead rights, K.S.A. 59-6a213 and K.S.A. 23-2404, violate the Kansas Constitution.”
— K.S.A. § 59-6a213(a) — 2 cases
In Re the Est. of Cross, 367 P.3d 298 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “The district court agreed with the Coexecutors, holding that Marilyn’s 1992 consent to Charles’ will constituted a waiver of the subsequently modified elective share rights under K.S.A. 59-6a213. Facts Charles and Marilyn were married on February 4, 1983, and were married for 26…”
Allison v. Sabin-Mitchell (Kan. Ct. App. 2026). “Dian appeals the district court's ruling, claiming the statutes that allow for premarital waiver of spousal homestead rights, K.S.A. 59-6a213 and K.S.A. 23-2404, violate the Kansas Constitution.”
— K.S.A. § 59-6a213(b) — 1 case
Allison v. Sabin-Mitchell (Kan. Ct. App. 2026). “Dian appeals the district court's ruling, claiming the statutes that allow for premarital waiver of spousal homestead rights, K.S.A. 59-6a213 and K.S.A. 23-2404, violate the Kansas Constitution.”
— K.S.A. § 59-6a213(d) — 1 case
In Re the Est. of Cross, 367 P.3d 298 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “The district court agreed with the Coexecutors, holding that Marilyn’s 1992 consent to Charles’ will constituted a waiver of the subsequently modified elective share rights under K.S.A. 59-6a213. Facts Charles and Marilyn were married on February 4, 1983, and were married for 26…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.