Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-3006 (2026)

Right of judgment creditor to bring action unimpaired

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-3006. Right of judgment creditor to bring action unimpaired. The right of a judgment creditor to bring an action to enforce his or her judgment instead of proceeding under this act remains unimpaired.

History: L. 1970, ch. 243, § 6; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1928–2010 · leading case: Padron v. Lopez, 220 P.3d 345 (Kan. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Padron v. Lopez, 220 P.3d 345 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 60-3006 (declaring that the right of a judgment creditor to bring an action to enforce a judgment instead of proceeding under the Foreign Judgments Act remains unimpaired); Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co.”

Alexander Constr. Co. v. Weaver, 594 P.2d 248 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 60-3006. It is merely another method available to the judgment creditor.”

Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Clemmons, 661 P.2d 1242 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 60-3006 declares that the right of a judgment creditor to bring an action to enforce his or her judgment instead of proceeding under the uniform act remains unimpaired.”

Warner v. Warner, 668 P.2d 193 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “Such a rule would defeat the purpose of the registration act and be totally inconsistent with the result achieved if the judgment holder sued on the foreign judgment, as permitted by K.S.A. 60-3006. Instead, registration of a foreign judgment which is enforceable when registered…”

Nat'l Union Fire Ins. v. Nicholas, 651 A.2d 1111 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). “K.S.A. 60-3006. It is merely another method available to the judgment creditor.”

St. Joseph Dev. Corp. v. Sequenzia, 585 N.W.2d 511 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). “Such a rule would defeat the purpose of the registration act and be totally inconsistent with the result achieved if the judgment holder sued on the foreign judgment, as permitted by K.S.A. 60-3006. Instead, registration of a foreign judgment which is enforceable when registered…”

Foley v. Foley, 641 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “1 The statute of limitations applicable to enforcement of a foreign judgment in Kansas should be the same regardless of which of these methods of enforcement is chosen by the judgment creditor.”

Glenn v. Callahan, 262 P. 583 (Kan. 1928). · cites it 2× “That would bring the actions to recover thereon within the second subdivision of the statute of limitations, section 60-3006 of the Revised Statutes. Such an action must be brought within three years from the time it accrues; but it is not the statute of limitations that is…”

Hankin v. Graphic Tech., Inc., 222 P.3d 523 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Nor would it have aided Hanldn to file a separate action as is allowed by K.S.A. 60-3006. See Johnson Brothers, 233 Kan.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.