Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-3007 (2026)

Uniformity of interpretation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-3007. Uniformity of interpretation. This act shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.

History: L. 1970, ch. 243, § 7; July 1.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1926–2010 · leading case: Padron v. Lopez, 220 P.3d 345 (Kan. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Padron v. Lopez, 220 P.3d 345 (Kan. 2009). “An additional consideration is that K.S.A. 60-3007 obligates us to interpret and construe the Foreign Judgments Act in uniformity with other states that have adopted tire uniform act.”
Goertz v. Goertz, 372 P.2d 268 (Kan. 1962). · cites it 4× “trict Court, for divorce from the defendant herein, on July 11, 1961, the same day the Court had made its order dismissing plaintiff’s motions in this case, and having examined the files herein, including plaintiff’s exhibits attached to her applications for injunction, does on…”
Beeler v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 265 P. 57 (Kan. 1928). · cites it 2× “Section 41-101 of the Revised Statutes provides that interest at six per cent shall be allowed for any money after it becomes due.”
Laidler v. Peterson, 92 P.2d 18 (Kan. 1939). · cites it 10× “Section 60-3007, subdivision 4, provides that judgments may be vacated or modified at or after the term at which such judgment was rendered “for fraud, practiced by the successful party, in obtaining the judgment or order,” and 60-3008 provides that such proceedings to vacate…”
Poorman v. Carlton, 253 P. 424 (Kan. 1927). · cites it 3× “” *766 'The pertinent parts of section 60-3007 of the Revised Statutes, section 596 of the code of civil procedure, are subdivisions five and eight, which read: “Fifth.”
Stillie v. Stillie, 249 P. 672 (Kan. 1926). · cites it 2× “” Section 60-3007 of the Revised Statutes provides that— “The district court shall have power to vacate or modify its own judgments or orders, at or after the term at which such judgment or order was made .”
In Re Est. of Bowman, 238 P.2d 486 (Kan. 1951). “1949, 60-3016 and sections 60-3007 to 60-3015, inclusive. The pertinent part of G.”
Mathey v. Mathey, 294 P.2d 202 (Kan. 1956). · cites it 2× ““Ill “Under the provisions of the General Statutes of Kansas, 1949, Section 60-3007, plaintiff herein petitions the court to vacate and modify the said decree of February 23, 1953, insofar as it affected or affects the property rights of the parties, for fraud, practiced by…”
Johnson v. Salkeld, 271 P. 385 (Kan. 1928). · cites it 2× “: This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition filed under the seventh subdivision of section 60-3007 of the Revised Statutes, in which James H.”
Dusing v. Schuessler, 166 P.2d 720 (Kan. 1946). · cites it 2× “Section 60-3007, supra, and section 60-3005, supra, when construed together, provide for the vacating and modifying of a judgment or order by granting a new trial upon *100 a showing of newly discovered evidence within the time and within the manner prescribed in the code.”
Hankin v. Graphic Tech., Inc., 222 P.3d 523 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “2d 377, 381 (Utah 1985) (K.S.A. 60-3007 specifically directs that the KUEFJA be interpreted and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make it uniform with the other states which enact it).”
Billings v. Billings, 228 P.2d 518 (Kan. 1951). “going into the question whether defendant has brought his action in the proper form and manner, the fact remains that by his cross-petition he sought to vacate the judgment and decree rendered in the separate maintenance action on the ground of fraud practiced by plaintiff in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.