60-519.
Suits stayed by injunction.
Whenever the commencement of any action shall be stayed by an injunction of any court, the time during which such injunction shall be in force shall not be deemed any portion of the time limit for the commencement of such action.
History:
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-519; January 1, 1964.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Automatic stay provision in bankruptcy proceeding tolls running of statute of limitations. Turner & Boisseau, Chtd. v. Lowrance, 18 Kan. App. 2d 332, 337, 852 P.2d 517 (1993).
2. State automatic bankruptcy stay duration on dormant judgment lien on real estate loans does not conflict with federal bankruptcy law. St. Joseph Dev. Corp. v. Sequenzia, 25 Kan. App. 2d 514, 518, 968 P.2d 682 (1998).
Turner & Boisseau, Chtd. v. Lowrance, 852 P.2d 517 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 13ד) Turner alleges the district court erred in granting partial summary judgment and that the *333 statute of limitations involved in this case was tolled by K.S.A. 60-519 and Kansas case law. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of Harper, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1136 (D. Kan. 2018). · cites it 4דPlaintiffs' response consists of three arguments: (1) "[t]he injury in this case was the destruction of the hotel and the loss of thousands of historic artifacts, memorabilia, museum pieces and personal items belonging to Plaintiffs," (2) Defendant did not finally decide to…”
St. Joseph Dev. Corp. v. Sequenzia, 968 P.2d 682 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3ד1993): “ ‘Section 108(c) permits the commencement or continuation of an action until the later of two periods.”
Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 998 F. Supp. 1221 (D. Kan. 1998). · cites it 4דand under such circumstances as to amount to an acknowledgment of the debtor’s existing liability on the obligation.”). A statute of limitations may also be tolled when a defendant is out of the state, K.”
Riggs v. Boeing Co., 12 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Kan. 1998). · cites it 2דA statute of limitations may also be tolled when a defendant is out of the state, K.”
John Doe v. M.J., 482 P.3d 596 (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). “2d 517 (1993) (engaging in a "broad reading" of K.S.A. 60-519). And we note that the Kansas Supreme Court applied K.”
Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y v. Holverson (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2דAs a result, Wilmington had 5 years and 211 days—the number of days Ashley's federal bankruptcy cases resulted in staying BOA's foreclosure action—to timely file its foreclosure petition against the Holversons.”
Spencer v. Millsap & Singer, LLC. (D. Kan. 2021). · cites it 2דBut plaintiffs do not assert that they were enjoined from bringing claims against defendant Millsap and Singer, LLC.”
Spencer v. Millsap & Singer, LLC. (D. Kan. 2021). “24) caused the court to provide an “[un]just and bias[ed] consideration of [m]andates of the Kansas [l]aw cited as non- conflicting conjunction of Status of Limitations Statutes of KSA 60-513 and KSA 60-519 when applied to l l U.S.C[. §] 108 which tolled Plaintiffs’ action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.