Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 61-1709 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

61-1709.

History: L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-1709; L. 1975, ch. 306, § 3; L. 1976, ch. 258, § 10; L. 1990, ch. 212, § 4; Repealed, L. 2000, ch. 161, § 117; January 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1979–2006 · leading case: Patterson v. Brouhard, 792 P.2d 983 (Kan. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Patterson v. Brouhard, 792 P.2d 983 (Kan. 1990). “Recause K.S.A. 61-1709 incorporates 60-213(g) into the procedure for limited actions, when the comparative *704 negligence of the parties to the limited action is an issue, a cross-claim against a co-party is compulsory.”

Kincaid v. Sturdevant, 437 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Kan. 2006). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff also attempts to rely on K.S.A. § 61-1709(a), but the Kansas legislature repealed that statute in 2001.”

Stanturf v. Quality Dodge, Inc., 596 P.2d 1247 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff did not request that defendant be required to plead any counterclaim pursuant to K.S.A. 61-1709. The case was tried and the trial court found that no switch of vehicles had occurred and denied all requested relief.”

— K.S.A. § 61-1709(a) — 1 case

Kincaid v. Sturdevant, 437 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Kan. 2006). “Plaintiff also attempts to rely on K.S.A. § 61-1709(a), but the Kansas legislature repealed that statute in 2001.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.