Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 61-2303 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

61-2303.

History: L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-2303; L. 1976, ch. 258, § 49; Repealed, L. 2000, ch. 161, § 117; January 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1972–1984 · leading case: Asbury v. Mauk, 687 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Asbury v. Mauk, 687 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “” K.S.A. 61-2303. Because we have decided that the tenants’ security deposit claims were improperly asserted and considered in the garnishment proceeding, the other issues raised on appeal need not be decided.”

Graber v. Griffin, 500 P.2d 35 (Kan. 1972). · cites it 2× “61-1303 (now K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 61-2303) involving actions in forcible detainer is discussed in a number of decisions which tend to support dismissal of an appeal as moot even though rights of parties may be affected thereby.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.