K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-4142 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-4142.

History: L. 1992, ch. 298, § 84; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 251; L. 1996, ch. 257, § 1; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 32, § 64; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Multiplicitous to charge illegal sale of drugs and receiving proceeds from illegal drug transactions. State v. Betz, 29 Kan. App. 2d 575, 30 P.3d 1037 (2001).

2. For conviction hereunder defendant must know drug proceeds were previously derived from conduct violating Uniform Controlled Substance Act. State v. McGrew, 29 Kan. App. 2d 1051, 36 P.3d 334 (2001).

3. Section is violated when defendant transports proceeds known to be derived from violation of Uniform Controlled Substances Act. State v. Romo-Uriarie, 33 Kan. App. 2d 22, 97 P.3d 1051 (2004).

4. Cited; court not required to impose nonprison sentence even when such sentence is presumed, when. State v. Andelt, 40 Kan. App. 2d 796, 797, 195 P.3d 1220 (2008).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2022 · leading case: State v. Romo-Uriarie, 97 P.3d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Romo-Uriarie, 97 P.3d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 24× “In McGrew , this court held that to be convicted of money laundering under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 65-4142, “one other than defendant must fix'st derive proceeds from a violation of the Act, then those proceeds must be received or acquired by defendant in another transaction.”
State v. Maass, 64 P.3d 382 (Kan. 2003). “21-3505, 21-3508, 21-3602, 21-3715, 21-4310, subsections (e)(2), (e)(3) and (e)(4) of K.S.A. 65-4142 or K.S.A. 65-4159, and amendments thereto, including an attempt, conspiracy or criminal solicitation, as defined in K.”
State v. McGrew, 36 P.3d 334 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “As the title to the Act section from which K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 65-4142 is taken indicates, this is a money laundering statute.”
State v. Andelt, 217 P.3d 976 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 2× “65-4162 with the following additional requirements: “(1) Whose offense is classified in grid blocks 4-E, 4-F, 4-G, 4-H or 4-1 of the sentencing guidelines grid for drug crimes and such offender has no felony conviction of K.S.A. 65-4142, 65-4159, 65-4161, 65-4163 or 65-4164, and…”
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “65-4162 with the following additional requirements: *313 “(1) Whose offense is classified in grid blocks 4-E, 4-F, 4-G, 4-H or 4-1 of the sentencing guidelines grid for drug crimes and such offender has no felony conviction of K.S.A. 65-4142, 65-4159, 65-4161, 65-4163 or…”
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). “21-4729(a)(l) requires placement in a certified drug treatment program if the “offense is classified in grid blocks 4-E, 4-F, 4-G, 4-H or 4-1 of the sentencing guidelines grid for drug crimes” and the defendant “has no felony conviction of K.S.A. 65-4142, 65-4159, 65-4161,…”
State v. de la Cerda, 109 P.3d 1248 (Kan. 2005). “65-4160 or 65-4162, and amendments thereto: “(1) Whose offense is classified in grid blocks 4-E, 4-F, 4-H or 4-I of the sentencing guidelines grid for drug crimes and such offender has no felony conviction of K.S.A. 65-4142, 65-4159, 65-4161, 65-4163 or 65-4164, and amendments…”
United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008). · cites it 2× “720, § 29B-1 (West 2003); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 65-4142 (2002); Minn.Stat.”
State v. Davis, 941 P.2d 946 (Kan. 1997). “, a severity level 7 nonperson felony under K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 65-4142. Our jurisdiction arises from K.”
State v. Blizzard, 225 P.3d 773 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “65-4152(a)(3); receiving proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act in violation of K.S.A. 65-4142; arranging the sale of drugs by using a communication device in violation of K.”
State v. Betz, 30 P.3d 1037 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “K.S.A. 65-4142 (Unlawfully Acquire Proceeds).”
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “Plus, the offender must have no felony conviction for a violation of K.S.A. 65-4142, 65-4159, 65-4161, 65-4163, or 65-4164.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 65-4142(a) — 1 case
State v. Romo-Uriarie, 97 P.3d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “In McGrew , this court held that to be convicted of money laundering under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 65-4142, “one other than defendant must fix'st derive proceeds from a violation of the Act, then those proceeds must be received or acquired by defendant in another transaction.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4142(b) — 1 case
State v. Romo-Uriarie, 97 P.3d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “In McGrew , this court held that to be convicted of money laundering under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 65-4142, “one other than defendant must fix'st derive proceeds from a violation of the Act, then those proceeds must be received or acquired by defendant in another transaction.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4142(c) — 1 case
State v. Romo-Uriarie, 97 P.3d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “In McGrew , this court held that to be convicted of money laundering under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 65-4142, “one other than defendant must fix'st derive proceeds from a violation of the Act, then those proceeds must be received or acquired by defendant in another transaction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.