K.S.A. » Chapter 66
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 66-118d (2026)

Same; precedence of action for review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

66-118d. Same; precedence of action for review. Any action for review commenced pursuant to K.S.A. 66-118c and amendments thereto shall have precedence in any court in which it is pending.

History: L. 1929, ch. 220, § 4; L. 1978, ch. 265, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 318, § 118; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 1965–1997 · leading case: Jones v. Kansas Gas & Elec. Co., 565 P.2d 597 (Kan. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Kansas Gas & Elec. Co., 565 P.2d 597 (Kan. 1977). · cites it 3× “Gas Service collected $444,220 in late payment charges, spending $484,984 collecting late bills. Both utilities argued late fees could not be considered interest because the charges were directly related to the real cost of collecting delinquent accounts.”
Kansas-Nebraska Nat. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 610 P.2d 121 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 3× “It is undisputed that this court has exclusive jurisdiction to review orders of the KCC involving public utility rates (K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 66-118a) and that we are limited to determining whether the order is lawful or reasonable (K.”
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 720 P.2d 1063 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 2× “792 (1979), where the court stated: "K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 66-118d limits judicial review of an order by the commission to determining whether the order is `lawful' or `reasonable.”
Kansas Power & Light Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 620 P.2d 329 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 3× “792 (1979): “K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 66-118d limits judicial review of an order by the commission to determining whether the order is ‘lawful’ or ‘reasonable.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 629 P.2d 1174 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 66-118d provides in part that upon application for judicial review, the KCC: “[S]hall forthwith transmit to the clerk of the court in which the application for review has been filed, a certified transcript of all pleadings, applications, proceedings, orders or decisions…”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 664 P.2d 798 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “At the outset it might be well to again set out the appropriate scope of review as provided by the controlling statute, K.S.A. 66-118d. The statute provides, in part: “Said proceedings for review shall be for the purpose of having the lawfulness or reasonableness of the original…”
Cities Serv. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 440 P.2d 660 (Kan. 1968). · cites it 2× “(K.S.A. 66-118d.) The review by the district court is solely upon the record made before the commission "for the purpose of having the lawfulness or reasonableness of the original order or decision or the order or decision on rehearing inquired into and determined," and "the…”
Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. State Corp. Comm'n, 595 P.2d 735 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “Application of this rationale in the past has resulted in the above schedule, whereby domestic and other firm customers pay something over 2% times as much for gas as large commercial and industrial users. The proposed increase, at a flat rate per Mcf for all customers, will…”
Elkhart Tel. Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 640 P.2d 335 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “Elkhart filed a timely motion for rehearing which was denied, then filed its application for judicial review with this court.”
Nw. Cent. Pipeline Corp. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 699 P.2d 1002 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 2× “2d 982 (1984), where we stated: "`K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 66-118d limits judicial review of an order by the commission to determining whether the order is "lawful" or "reasonable.”
Peoples Nat. Gas Div. of N. Nat. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 644 P.2d 999 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “792 (1979): “K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 66-118d limits judicial review of an order by the commission to determining whether the order is ‘lawful’ or ‘reasonable.”
Pelican Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 402 P.2d 762 (Kan. 1965). · cites it 2× “Section 66-118d, in part, reads: “The secretary upon receipt of said copy of the application for review shall forthwith transmit to the clerk of the district court in which the application for review has been filed, a certified transcript of all pleadings, applications,…”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.