K.S.A. § 74-8801
Title and application of act
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
74-8801. Title and application of act. K.S.A. 74-8801 through 74-8839 and amendments thereto shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas parimutuel racing act and shall apply to all horse race meetings at which parimutuel wagering is used or intended to be used and to all greyhound race meetings at which parimutuel wagering is used or intended to be used.
History: L. 1987, ch. 112, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 146, § 1; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1989–2020 · leading case: Boatright v. Kansas Racing Commission
Boatright v. Kansas Racing Commission (1992)
“" K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 74-8801. *251 Here, two separate trial judges independently heard this issue in different judicial districts and arrived at the same legal conclusion I do.”
Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing Commission (1989)
“, (Sunflower) under the Kansas Parimutuel Racing Act (Act), K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 74-8801 et seq. Appellants claim: (1) the Commission’s refusal to disclose Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) investigative reports to appellants and the Commission’s failure to provide appellants an…”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1994)
“), allowing horse and dog racing with parimutuel betting (K.S.A. 74-8801 et seq. ), and allowing a state-owned and operated lottery (K.”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing Commission (1990)
“The Kansas Parimutuel Racing Act, K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 74-8801 et seq. was enacted on May 28, 1987.”
State Ex Rel. Six v. Kansas Lottery (2008)
“Following approval of the 1986 amendments, Kansas enacted legislation allowing horse and dog racing (K.S.A. 74-8801 et seq.) and enabling a state-owned and operated lottery (K.”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1992)
“)\ horse and dog racing with parimutuel betting thereon (K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 74-8801 et seq.)-, and state-owned and operated lottery (K.”
Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Racing & Gaming Co. (In Re Sunflower Racing, Inc.) (1998)
“See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 74-8801 et seq. The Kansas Racing and Gaming Commission granted TRAK East an organization license for pari-mutuel betting in 1988.”
Zimmerman v. Board of County Commissioners (2011)
“The court ruled that its analysis first required an examination of the nature of an applicant’s interest in the grant of a license under the Kansas Parimutuel Racing Act, K.S.A. 74-8801 et seq. Appellants contended their license applications created a protected property right in…”
Reed v. Kansas Racing Commission (1993)
“Virgil Delbert Reed, former general manager of the Wichita Greyhound Park, appeals the district court’s affirmance of an order entered by the KRC under the Parimutuél Racing Act, K.S.A. 74-8801 et seq.- The order revoked his occupation license, fined him $6,000, and permanently…”
Kerr v. Kimmell (1990)
“§ 2132 (g), is a reasonable exercise of legislative judgment and does not regulate greyhounds because jurisdiction over greyhounds registered with the National Greyhound Association, the only dogs which can participate in a parimutuel race, is vested in the Kansas Racing…”
In Re Sunflower Racing, Inc. (1998)
“K.S.A. 74-8801 et seq. 5 . Initially, the corporate names were Woodlands Racing and Gaming Company I, Woodlands Racing and Gaming Company II, and Woodlands Racing and Gaming Company III.”
Weber v. Board of County Commissioners (1994)
“Dogs are not included under any Kansas statutory definition of livestock.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.