K.S.A. » Chapter 77
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 77-512 (2026)

Orders affecting licensure; requirements

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

77-512. Orders affecting licensure; requirements. A state agency may not revoke, suspend, modify, annul, withdraw, refuse to renew, or amend a license unless the state agency first gives notice and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with this act. This section does not preclude a state agency from (a) taking immediate action to protect the public interest in accordance with K.S.A. 77-536, and amendments thereto, or (b) adopting rules and regulations, otherwise within the scope of its authority, pertaining to a class of licensees, including rules and regulations affecting the existing licenses of a class of licensees.

History: L. 1984, ch. 313, § 12; L. 1989, ch. 283, § 3; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Notice requirements under Kansas administrative procedure act examined in review of license revocation. Reed v. Kansas Racing Comm'n, 253 Kan. 602, 611, 860 P.2d 864 (1993).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: Columbian Fin. Corp. v. Bowman, 314 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (D. Kan. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Columbian Fin. Corp. v. Bowman, 314 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (D. Kan. 2018). “Given the breadth of circumstances affecting licensure that invoke a hearing when a license is effected, clearly, then, a bank's seizure and the effective termination of its operation as a going banking concern, as occurred in present case, should command a hearing by the…”
Reed v. Kansas Racing Comm'n, 860 P.2d 684 (Kan. 1993). “K.S.A. 77-512. The notice must contain “a statement of the issues involved and, to the extent known to the presiding officer, of the matters asserted by the parties.”
Turner & Boisseau v. Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts, 978 P.2d 288 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “In short, the agency (the Board) never had the opportunity to address the sanctions issues before appellants proceeded to district court. The district court correctly concluded that it could not examine an issue which appellants had failed to raise before the Board.”
Estivo v. Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “What notice is due here? Under the Kansas Administrative Procedure Act, "[a] state agency may not revoke, suspend, modify, annul, withdraw, refuse to renew, or amend a license unless the state agency first gives notice and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with this act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.