K.S.A. » Chapter 77
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 77-623 (2026)

Review by higher court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

77-623. Review by higher court. Decisions on petitions for judicial review of agency action are reviewable by the appellate courts as in other civil cases.

History: L. 1984, ch. 338, § 23; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Goldman v. Univ. of Kansas, 365 P.3d 435 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goldman v. Univ. of Kansas, 365 P.3d 435 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 7× “Goldman and KU essentially contend that a final decision on a petition for judicial review of an agency action is appealable as if it were a separate civil action, even when other claims joined in the same case remain pending in tire district court.”
Jones v. Kansas State Univ., 106 P.3d 10 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2× “77-621(a)(1). Parties that appeal an agency action to the district court pursuant to the KJRA may appeal the district court decision to the appellate courts, just as parties do in other civil cases.”
Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 447 P.3d 959 (Kan. 2019). “" Personal service is defined in the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure as "delivering or offering to deliver a copy of the process and petition or other document to the person to *969 be served." K.S.A. 2014 Supp.”
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Todd, 905 P.2d 114 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 77-623. The determination of whether K.”
Bd. of Educ. v. NEA-Goodland, 785 P.2d 993 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to K.S.A. 77-623, “[djecisions on petitions for judicial review of agency action are reviewable by the appellate courts as in other civil cases.”
Drake v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 32 P.3d 705 (Kan. 2001). “” K.S.A. 77-623. The Kansas *234 Court of Appeals has held that, when reviewing a district court’s decision in a motor vehicle license suspension case, a substantial competent evidence standard of review is proper.”
CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. v. Kansas Dep't of Human Resources, 38 P.3d 666 (Kan. 2002). “” KDHR now appeals the district court’s judgment pursuant to K.S.A. 77-623 and K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 60-2103.”
Jones v. Cont'l Can Co., 920 P.2d 939 (Kan. 1996). “This also brings into focus the provision of K.S.A. 77-623 which states that “[djecisions on petitions for judicial review of agency action are reviewable by the appellate courts as in other civil cases.”
Zinke & Trumbo, Ltd. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 749 P.2d 21 (Kan. 1988). “Let us therefore consider whether the KCC has jurisdiction of natural gas regulation in a gas field in the absence of a finding based upon substantial competent evidence that the field is a “common source of supply.” K.”
Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 885 P.2d 1233 (Kan. 1994). “Sunflower’s failure to object or request substitutes for the two members who failed to complete the hearing precluded it from raising that issue on appeal.”
Angleton v. Starkan, Inc., 828 P.2d 933 (Kan. 1992). “Starkan argues the district court erred in finding that the incident which resulted in Angleton’s death arose out of and in the course of his employment and that the finding was not supported by substantial competent evidence.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 279 v. Sec'y of Kansas Dep't of Human Resources, 802 P.2d 516 (Kan. 1990). “K.S.A. 77-623. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law and it is our function to interpret the statute to give it the intended effect.”
Show all 53 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.