K.S.A. » Chapter 08
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 8-1007 (2026)

Same; act supplemental; invalidity of part

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-1007. Same; act supplemental; invalidity of part. This act shall be construed as supplemental to existing legislation; and if any clause, paragraph, subsection or section of this act shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, it shall be conclusively presumed that the legislature would have enacted the remainder of this act without such invalid or unconstitutional clause, paragraph, subsection or section.

History: L. 1955, ch. 279, § 3; June 30.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2018–2020 · leading case: Sandate v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 119514 (Kan. Ct. App. July 17, 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sandate v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 119514 (Kan. Ct. App. July 17, 2020). “8-1007: "This act shall be construed as supplemental to existing legislation; and if any clause, paragraph, subsection or section of this act shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, it shall be conclusively presumed that the legislature would have enacted the remainder of…”
Fisher v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 471 P.3d 710 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “" K.S.A. 8-1007. As a separate defect in the notice, Fisher argues that the first statement of the 2016 implied consent advisories—which states that "Kansas law requires the person to submit to and complete" any requested test—is a misstatement of the law and unduly coercive,…”
Scott v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 120717 (Kan. Ct. App. May 8, 2020). · cites it 2× “5 Scott's argument is further undermined by K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 8-1007, which provides: "This act shall be construed as supplemental to existing legislation; and if any clause, paragraph, subsection or section of this act shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, it shall be…”
Morris v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 119511 (Kan. Ct. App. July 24, 2020). · cites it 2× “8-1007 clearly directs: "[I]f any clause, paragraph, subsection or section of this act shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, it shall be conclusively presumed that the legislature would have enacted the remainder of this act without such invalid or unconstitutional clause,…”
Cameron v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue, 430 P.3d 490 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “This interpretation places law enforcement officers in a dilemma. They must either give warnings that are unconstitutional or violate the statute by failing to give the warnings.”
Reilly v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 120840 (Kan. Ct. App. May 1, 2020). “K.S.A. 8-1007; see Williamson v. Kansas Dept.”
Fordham v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 121410 (Kan. Ct. App. May 1, 2020). “K.S.A. 8-1007; see Williamson, 2018 WL 5730137 , at *5.”
Trowbridge v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 119510 (Kan. Ct. App. July 17, 2020). “8-1007: 10 "This act shall be construed as supplemental to existing legislation; and if any clause, paragraph, subsection or section of this act shall be held invalid or unconstitutional, it shall be conclusively presumed that the legislature would have enacted the remainder of…”
Oglesbee v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 119659 (Kan. Ct. App. July 17, 2020). “" K.S.A. 8-1007. By providing Oglesbee with the implied consent advisories in the revised DC-70, law enforcement substantially complied with K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.