Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 82a-717 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

82a-717.

History: L. 1945, ch. 390, § 17; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 539, § 26; June 29.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Discussed in determining remedies available under act to common law claimants and appropriation users. Williams v. City of Wichita, 190 Kan. 317, 335, 338, 374 P.2d 578.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1956–2019 · leading case: Baumann v. Smrha, 145 F. Supp. 617 (D. Kan. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baumann v. Smrha, 145 F. Supp. 617 (D. Kan. 1956). · cites it 2× “” Section 82a-717 provides: “Beneficial purpose; termination for nonuse.”
Garetson Bros. v. Am. Warrior, Inc., 435 P.3d 1153 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “82a-716 and K.S.A. 82a-717, Garetson was not required to exhaust administrative remedies at any point in time during the district court's jurisdiction over the case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.