Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.193 (2026)

Statement of goals and objectives -- Action on statement by legislative

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

bodies and fiscal courts -- Notice -- Hearing. (1) The planning commission of each planning unit shall prepare and adopt the statement of goals and objectives to act as a guide for the preparation of the remaining elements and the aids to implementing the plans. The statement shall be presented for consideration, amendment, and adoption by each legislative body and fiscal court in the planning unit. The legislative bodies and fiscal courts shall take action upon the proposed statement of goals and objectives within ninety (90) days of the date upon which the legislative body or fiscal court receives the planning commission's final action upon such proposal. If no action is taken within the ninety (90) day period, the statement of goals and objectives shall be deemed to have been approved by operation of law. (2) Each legislative body and fiscal court in the planning unit may develop goals and objectives for the area within its jurisdiction which the planning commission shall consider when preparing or amending the comprehensive plan. During its preparation and that of the other plan elements, it shall be the duty of the planning commission to consult with public officials and agencies, boards of health, school boards, public and private utility companies, civic, educational, professional, and other organizations, and with citizens. (3) During the preparation of the statement of goals and objectives, and at least fourteen (14) days prior to any public hearing on the adoption, amendment, or readoption of any element of the comprehensive plan, the planning commission shall give notice of the preparation of the statement or the hearing to the following public officials in each city and county adjacent to the planning unit: (a) If the adjacent city or county is part of a planning unit, the notice shall be sent to the planning commission of that unit; or (b) If the adjacent city or county is not part of a planning unit, the notice shall be sent to the chief executive officer of that city or county government. (4) The notice required in subsection (3) of this section, and a copy of the proposed comprehensive plan element, shall also be given to the regional planning council for the area in which the planning unit is located. The council shall coordinate the review and comments of local governments and planning commissions serving planning units affected by the proposal and make recommendations designed to promote coordinated land use in the regional planning council's area of jurisdiction. (5) Any planning commission which is adopting, amending, or readopting any element of the comprehensive plan may conduct a hearing to receive testimony from adjacent planning units, city or county governments, or the regional planning council of the affected area. Effective: July 15, 2008 History: Amended 2008 Ky. Acts ch. 167, sec. 1, effective July 15, 2008. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 268, sec. 2, effective July 14, 1992. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 362, sec. 2, effective July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec. 13, effective July 15, 1986. -- Created 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 27.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: City of Lakeside Park v. Quinn, 672 S.W.2d 666 (Ky. 1984).
City of Lakeside Park v. Quinn, 672 S.W.2d 666 (Ky. 1984). · cites it 7× “The issue in this appeal is whether the adoption of the goals and principles, the first element of the comprehensive plan, by the city in compliance with KRS 100.193 and 100.201 was sufficient to authorize the adoption of a valid zoning code for the city.”
Daviess Cnty. v. Snyder, 556 S.W.2d 688 (Ky. 1977). · cites it 3× “KRS 100.193. Daviess County and the City of Owens-boro are members of a joint city-county planning unit of which OMPC is the planning authority under KRS 100.”
Baesler v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't, 237 S.W.3d 209 (Ky. Ct. App. 2007). “KRS 100.193. The “statement of goals and objectives” is then ratified by the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council.”
Fritz v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't, 986 S.W.2d 456 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “KRS 100.193. This master plan for an area is comprehensive in that numerous and extensive elements or studies are to be considered in formulating and adopting the plan.”
Bellemeade Co. v. Priddle, 503 S.W.2d 734 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). “” KRS 100.193 and KRS 100.197, when read together, are sufficiently broad to allow the procedure provided for in section 13 of the Paducah zoning ordinance.”
Billy C. Just. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't Council (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “KRS 100.193 (emphasis added). Finally, “[a]ll elements of the comprehensive plan shall be prepared with a view towards carrying out the statement of goals and objectives.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.193(1) — 1 case
Billy C. Just. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't Council (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “KRS 100.193 (emphasis added). Finally, “[a]ll elements of the comprehensive plan shall be prepared with a view towards carrying out the statement of goals and objectives.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.193(2) — 1 case
Billy C. Just. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't Council (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “KRS 100.193 (emphasis added). Finally, “[a]ll elements of the comprehensive plan shall be prepared with a view towards carrying out the statement of goals and objectives.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.