Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 118

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.080

Repealed, 1972

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Nomination for regular election by petition. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 69, effective December 1, 1972. -- Amended 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 83, sec. 3, effective June 18, 1964. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1453, 1454.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1949–1971 · leading case: Stewart v. Burks
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stewart v. Burks (1964) kyctapp · cites it 8× “In 1964 both KRS 160.220 and KRS 118.-080 were amended. The latter statute required the signatures of twenty qualified electors (whereas old 160.”
Mann v. Cornett (1969) kyctapp · cites it 10× “The petition was filed pursuant to the authorizing provisions of KRS 118.080. In addition to other pertinent language, the petition provides in part: “ * * * that the undersigned petitioners and subscribers designate, ‘EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW’ as the name of the party, or as…”
Queenan v. Mimms (1955) kyctapphigh · cites it 3× “040, and that each and every member of the council is elected by the qualified voters of the entire city.”
Dupin v. Sullivan (1962) kyctapphigh · cites it 3× “The 5 appellants were the only persons officially nominated as town trustees in the manner authorized by KRS 118.080, and their names were the only ones listed on the voting machine for those offices.”
Hall v. Reid (1957) kyctapp · cites it 2× “Harris was proposed as a candidate by a nominating petition under KRS 118.080, which was signed by 20 persons, the number required by the statute.”
Coffey v. Anderson (1963) kyctapphigh “Being of the opinion that in many instances this would be impracticable and an unreasonable burden, we have reconsidered the question of proper definition and have concluded that registration is one of the essential qualifications of a “voter.”
Huie v. Jones (1962) kyctapp “2d 923 , it was held that the signer of a nominating petition filed under KRS 118.080 should be a registered voter legally qualified to vote for the candidate.”
Hallahan v. Anderson (1971) kyctapp · cites it 4× “KRS 118.080. The county court clerk declined to receive the petition, being of the view that it was tendered too late by reason of KRS 118.”
Brown v. Read (1949) kyctapphigh “In the present action the appellant, in support of his plea that a mandatory injunction issue requiring the appellees — Thomas Fitzpatrick, Leonard Conners, • and Ralph Rich, election commissioners — to issue a certificate of nomination to him, calls our attention to KRS 118.080…”
Carter v. Henrickson (1962) kyctapp · cites it 2× “In an opinion the Attorney General claimed appellee’s petitions, filed pursuant to KRS 118.080(2), failed (a) to nominate him for any office; and (b) to designate specifically the district to be represented.”
Rudy v. Queenan (1955) kyctapp “We accept the trial court’s construction of the several petitions as adequately revealing the post office addresses of the petitioners, namely, that stating their respective house numbers, street names and “Louisville, Kentucky” met the requirements of the statute (KRS 118.080)…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.080(1) — 1 case
Mann v. Cornett (1969) kyctapp “The petition was filed pursuant to the authorizing provisions of KRS 118.080. In addition to other pertinent language, the petition provides in part: “ * * * that the undersigned petitioners and subscribers designate, ‘EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW’ as the name of the party, or as…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.080(2) — 3 cases
Stewart v. Burks (1964) kyctapp “In 1964 both KRS 160.220 and KRS 118.-080 were amended. The latter statute required the signatures of twenty qualified electors (whereas old 160.”
Mann v. Cornett (1969) kyctapp “The petition was filed pursuant to the authorizing provisions of KRS 118.080. In addition to other pertinent language, the petition provides in part: “ * * * that the undersigned petitioners and subscribers designate, ‘EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW’ as the name of the party, or as…”
Carter v. Henrickson (1962) kyctapp “In an opinion the Attorney General claimed appellee’s petitions, filed pursuant to KRS 118.080(2), failed (a) to nominate him for any office; and (b) to designate specifically the district to be represented.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.