Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.071 (2026)

Repealed, 1974

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Campaign treasurers. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 198; amended ch. 315, sec. 10; and ch. 375, sec. 5. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 81, sec. 5. -- Created 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1967–1974 · leading case: Stovall v. Cook, 512 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
Stovall v. Cook, 512 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 4× “KRS 123.071, a section of the statutory chapter covering corrupt practices in elections, requires a candidate for elective pub- *488 he office to designate a campaign treasurer.”
Dempsey v. Stovall, 418 S.W.2d 419 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “KRS 123.071(1) provides: “Each candidate in an election shall appoint one campaign treasurer and shall designate a campaign depository on or before the date of public announcement of his candidacy or on the date he files as a candidate, whichever is sooner.”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 3× “The principal ground asserted was that appellee candidate (hereafter “Willis”) had failed to appoint a campaign treasurer and designate a campaign depository at the time specified in KRS 123.071(1) (a section of the “Corrupt Practices Act”).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.071(1) — 2 cases
Dempsey v. Stovall, 418 S.W.2d 419 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “KRS 123.071(1) provides: “Each candidate in an election shall appoint one campaign treasurer and shall designate a campaign depository on or before the date of public announcement of his candidacy or on the date he files as a candidate, whichever is sooner.”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “The principal ground asserted was that appellee candidate (hereafter “Willis”) had failed to appoint a campaign treasurer and designate a campaign depository at the time specified in KRS 123.071(1) (a section of the “Corrupt Practices Act”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.