Ky. Rev. Stat. § 160.615

Taxes payable, when -- Extension

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The school taxes authorized by KRS 160.613 and 160.614 shall be due and payable monthly and shall be remitted to the department on or before the twentieth day of the next succeeding calendar month. (2) On or before the twentieth day of the month following each calendar month, a return for the preceding month shall be filed with the department in the form prescribed by the department, together with any tax due. (3) For purposes of facilitating the administration, payment or collection of the taxes levied by KRS 160.613 and 160.614, the department, in consultation with the impacted school district, may permit or require returns or tax payments for periods other than those prescribed in subsections (1) and (2) of this section. (4) The department may, upon written request received on or prior to the due date of the return or tax, for good cause satisfactory to the department, extend the time for filing the return or paying the tax for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days. (5) Any person to whom an extension is granted and who pays the tax within the period for which the extension is granted shall pay, in addition to the tax, interest at the tax interest rate as defined in KRS 131.010(6) from the date on which the tax would otherwise have been due. Effective: March 6, 2006 History: Amended 2006 Ky. Acts ch. 6, sec. 21, effective March 6, 2006. -- Amended 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 79, sec. 4, effective July 1, 2005. -- Repealed and reenacted 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V, sec. 463, effective July 13, 1990. -- Created 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 24, Part III, sec. 10.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1971–2013 · leading case: Directv, Inc. v. Treesh
Directv, Inc. v. Treesh (2009) ky “KRS 160.615. While the Kentucky General Assembly was responding to the evolution of multichannel video programming with these changes to the school tax provisions, Congress was addressing the same program *641 ming evolution in other ways.”
Lámar v. Board of Education of Hancock Co. Sch. Dist. (1971) kyctapphigh “” It is the contention of the appellant that the word “shall” appearing in KRS 160.615 and KRS 160.648(2) is mandatory and that the fiscal court, in permitting an extension of time in which to pay, violated the statutes.”
Commonwealth v. Saint Joseph Health System, Inc. (2013) kyctapp “613(2) states that when taxable utilities are purchased directly from a supplier who is exempt, the consumer shall be liable for the tax and shall pay the tax directly to the county finance officer, in accordance with the provisions of KRS 160.615. Such tax is computed by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.