(1) The preliminary hearing need not be formal and may include the receiving of the
qualified mental health professionals' reports as evidence. The hearing may be held
by the court in chambers, at a hospital, or other suitable place. The respondent shall
be afforded an opportunity to testify, to present, and cross-examine witnesses who
appear and testify against him. The court may exclude all persons not necessary for
the conduct of the hearing. The respondent and his attorney may waive respondent's
right to a preliminary hearing.
(2) The final hearing may be conducted in an informal manner, consistent with orderly
procedures, and in a physical setting not likely to have a harmful effect on the
mental or physical health of the respondent. The hearing may be held by the court in
chambers, at a hospital, or other suitable place. The respondent shall be afforded an
opportunity to testify, to present, and cross-examine witnesses against him. The
manner of proceeding and rules of evidence shall be the same as those in any
criminal proceeding including the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Proceedings shall be heard by a judge unless a party requests a jury trial. Neither the
respondent nor the respondent's attorney may waive the respondent's right to a final
hearing.
Effective: July 15, 1988
History: Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 139, sec. 7, effective July 15, 1988. -- Created
1982 Ky. Acts ch. 445, sec. 14, effective July 1, 1982.
Legislative Research Commission Note. This section was enacted in 1982 Acts,
Chapter 445, which contains the following language in Section 45 of that Act: "This
Act shall become effective on July 1, 1982." The Ky. Constitution, in Section 55,
requires that a reason be set forth for the emergency. However, no reason is set forth
in this Act. The effective date for 1982 Acts with no emergency provision is July 15,
1982.
Notes of Decisions
Steven Lee Enterprises v. Varney (2000)
ky · cites it 2×
“2d 257 (1993), in which the United States Supreme Court analyzed two Kentucky statutes, KRS 202A.076(2) and KRS 202B.160(2), and discerned no violation of the Equal Protection Clause.”
Schuttemeyer v. Commonwealth (1990)
kyctapp · cites it 2×
“The procedures for the hearings, which may be informal and require the presence of the respondent, regarding which we note that the record does indicate Schuttemeyer’s presence at the preliminary hearing, are set forth in KRS 202A.076. See also Doe by <a…”
Messer v. Roney (1989)
kyctapp
“KRS 202A.076(2). Although the statute now being challenged does not provide for a specific standard of proof, we find that the intrusiveness of KRS 202A.”
R. L. P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)
kyctapp · cites it 2×
“” KRS 202A.076. Both KRS Chapter 202A and KRS Chapter 202C also allow the respondent to request a jury for the final hearing.”
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
ky
“” KRS 202A.076(2). Likewise, KRS Chapter 202B requires a court to find, following a “preliminary hearing,” that “there is probable cause to believe the respondent should be involuntarily admitted[]” (i.”
Commonwealth v. Brown (1995)
kyctapp
“Appellant insists that because KRS 202A.076(2) requires the application of the Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure to proceedings under Chapter 202A, RCr 1.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 202A.076(2) — 5 cases
Steven Lee Enterprises v. Varney (2000)
ky
“2d 257 (1993), in which the United States Supreme Court analyzed two Kentucky statutes, KRS 202A.076(2) and KRS 202B.160(2), and discerned no violation of the Equal Protection Clause.”
Messer v. Roney (1989)
kyctapp
“KRS 202A.076(2). Although the statute now being challenged does not provide for a specific standard of proof, we find that the intrusiveness of KRS 202A.”
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
ky
“” KRS 202A.076(2). Likewise, KRS Chapter 202B requires a court to find, following a “preliminary hearing,” that “there is probable cause to believe the respondent should be involuntarily admitted[]” (i.”
Commonwealth v. Brown (1995)
kyctapp
“Appellant insists that because KRS 202A.076(2) requires the application of the Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure to proceedings under Chapter 202A, RCr 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.