litem -- Duty of Commonwealth's attorney.
(1) When a defendant who is charged with a qualifying offense has been found,
after a hearing under KRS Chapter 504, to be incompetent to stand trial with no
substantial probability that the defendant will attain competency within three
hundred sixty (360) days, the Commonwealth's attorney's office serving the
county of criminal prosecution shall immediately petition the Circuit Court that
found the defendant incompetent to stand trial or, if the finding was by a District
Court, the Circuit Court in the county of the criminal prosecution, for an
involuntary commitment proceeding, to include an evidentiary hearing and a
commitment hearing, if applicable, under this chapter.
(2) Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall assign a guardian ad litem to
represent the needs and best interest of the respondent. The guardian ad litem
shall be a full and active participant in all proceedings other than the
evidentiary hearing under KRS 202C.030 and shall independently investigate,
assess, and advocate for the defendant's best interest. The guardian ad litem
is not a replacement for the defense attorney. If the defendant has retained or
been appointed a defense attorney in the criminal case, that attorney may
continue to represent the defendant in proceedings under this chapter. If, at
any time during the pendency of proceedings under this chapter, the defendant
is not represented by an attorney, the court shall appoint counsel for the
defendant, without a showing of indigency, to be provided by the Department of
Public Advocacy or its designee.
(3) The Circuit Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all proceedings under
this chapter.
Effective:April 1, 2021
History: Created 2021 Ky. Acts ch. 175, sec. 7, effective April 1, 2021.
Notes of Decisions
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
ky · cites it 3×
“KRS 202C.020(1). After the Commonwealth’s Attorney files a petition to initiate commitment proceedings under Chapter 202C, the “defendant” becomes the “respondent,” and the court must immediately assign counsel, a guardian ad litem (GAL), “to represent the needs and best…”
G. P. v. Honorable Angela McCormick Bisig (2022)
ky · cites it 2×
“KRS 202C.020(1). After this filing, the defendant1 is appointed a guardian ad litem and defense counsel, if the defendant does not already have counsel.”
R. L. P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)
kyctapp
“KRS 202C.020(1)-(2). During the initial evidentiary hearing, the trial court must determine, using a preponderance of the evidence, “whether sufficient evidence exists to support a finding that the respondent is guilty of the charged crime against him or her.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 202C.020(1) — 4 cases
G. P. v. Honorable Angela McCormick Bisig (2022)
ky
“KRS 202C.020(1). After this filing, the defendant1 is appointed a guardian ad litem and defense counsel, if the defendant does not already have counsel.”
R. L. P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)
kyctapp
“KRS 202C.020(1)-(2). During the initial evidentiary hearing, the trial court must determine, using a preponderance of the evidence, “whether sufficient evidence exists to support a finding that the respondent is guilty of the charged crime against him or her.”
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
ky
“KRS 202C.020(1). After the Commonwealth’s Attorney files a petition to initiate commitment proceedings under Chapter 202C, the “defendant” becomes the “respondent,” and the court must immediately assign counsel, a guardian ad litem (GAL), “to represent the needs and best…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 202C.020(2) — 3 cases
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
ky
“KRS 202C.020(1). After the Commonwealth’s Attorney files a petition to initiate commitment proceedings under Chapter 202C, the “defendant” becomes the “respondent,” and the court must immediately assign counsel, a guardian ad litem (GAL), “to represent the needs and best…”
G. P. v. Honorable Angela McCormick Bisig (2022)
ky
“KRS 202C.020(1). After this filing, the defendant1 is appointed a guardian ad litem and defense counsel, if the defendant does not already have counsel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.