Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.060 (2026)

Repealed, 1987

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Conduct of hearing. History: Repealed 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 423, sec. 198 , effective July 1, 1987; amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 439, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1986. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 188, secs. 157 and 199, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 18, sec. 2, effective June 19, 1976; and ch. 168, sec. 3, effective June 19, 1976. -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 325, sec. 1, effective June 16, 1972. -- Created 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 161, sec. 6, effective January 1, 1953. Note: This section was repealed by 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, which was to have become effective July 1, 1982. Thereafter, 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284 changed the effective date of that act to July 15, 1984. Then, 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 184 repealed both 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, and 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1968–2002 · leading case: McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971).
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971). · cites it 2× “27 (1971); Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.060 (1962); La Rev. Stat.”
Johnson v. Simpson, 433 S.W.2d 644 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 3× “020(3) and from juvenile sessions of the county court held under KRS 208.060. The question reaches this court by way of an appeal taken by the county judge from an order of the Fayette Circuit Court in a mandamus proceeding against him prohibiting him from excluding members of…”
Hubbs v. Commonwealth, 511 S.W.2d 664 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “Hubbs claims the judgment as to him is void because the waiver order entered by the juvenile court failed (a) to set forth sufficient reasons for the transfer of jurisdiction, (b) to indicate that a hearing was held and that he was represented by counsel, and (c) to show “ * * *…”
Commonwealth v. Philpott, 75 S.W.3d 209 (Ky. 2002). “But see former KRS 208.060(2) (repealed 1986 Ky. Acts ch.”
Bingham v. Commonwealth, 550 S.W.2d 535 (Ky. 1977). “” The order waiving jurisdiction reads as follows: “The Court verifying that the rights provided in KRS 208.060(3) and (4) have been extended to the child and the adult responsible for the child, due process of law having been observed, the allegations having been proven beyond…”
Dep't for Human Resources Commonwealth v. Nester, 585 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979). “It is our opinion that the clear meaning of KRS 208.060(3)(a) and (5) mandates such appointment.”
Miller v. Anderson, 519 S.W.2d 826 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “” KRS 208.060 sets out the conduct of hearings and specifically provides in subsection (2) thereof that the juvenile proceedings shall consist of two distinct hearings, an adjudication and a disposition, which may, upon motion of the child, be held on separate days.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.060(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Philpott, 75 S.W.3d 209 (Ky. 2002). “But see former KRS 208.060(2) (repealed 1986 Ky. Acts ch.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.060(3) — 2 cases
Hubbs v. Commonwealth, 511 S.W.2d 664 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). “Hubbs claims the judgment as to him is void because the waiver order entered by the juvenile court failed (a) to set forth sufficient reasons for the transfer of jurisdiction, (b) to indicate that a hearing was held and that he was represented by counsel, and (c) to show “ * * *…”
Bingham v. Commonwealth, 550 S.W.2d 535 (Ky. 1977). “” The order waiving jurisdiction reads as follows: “The Court verifying that the rights provided in KRS 208.060(3) and (4) have been extended to the child and the adult responsible for the child, due process of law having been observed, the allegations having been proven beyond…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.060(3)(a) — 1 case
Dep't for Human Resources Commonwealth v. Nester, 585 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979). “It is our opinion that the clear meaning of KRS 208.060(3)(a) and (5) mandates such appointment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.