Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.080 (2026)
Repealed, 1976
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Appeals in cases involving less than $2500. History: Repealed 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 67, sec. 14, effective March 23, 1976. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 101, sec. 1. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 2. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 950-3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 132
cases, 1943–1968 · leading case: Browley v. Murkison, 282 S.W.2d 352 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
Browley v. Murkison, 282 S.W.2d 352 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “03 and this case has been prosecuted as though appellant had an appeal as a matter of right.”
Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Lewis, 296 S.W.2d 228 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “If it be admitted arguem do that respondent had jurisdiction to amend this judgment under CR 60.”
Hoy v. Newburg Homes, Inc., 325 S.W.2d 301 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “070 was not timely made and because under KRS 21.080 it was not shown that the amount in controversy is as much as $200.”
OP Link Handle Co. v. Wright, 429 S.W.2d 842 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “KRS 21.080; RCA 1.180. On April 22, 1960, the Wrights entered into a contract by which they sold to W.”
Mullins v. Hall, 273 S.W.2d 831 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “The statement of appeal does not say whether the appeal is prosecuted under KRS 21.080 as is required by RCA 1.090. The statute, KRS 21.”
McLean v. Thurman, 273 S.W.2d 825 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “080, considered together with KRS 21.070 (which has been effective since 1914), appeared to make a monetary valuation of the matter involved in the controversy the criterion for determining: (1) if a party could take an appeal under any circumstances, and (2) if a party must…”
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Air Bd. v. Porter, 397 S.W.2d 146 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “Because of the importance of the questions involved, this court sustained the Air Board’s motion for an appeal, KRS 21.080, RCA 1.180, and has had the benefit of oral argument supplementing the briefs by counsel for the respective parties.”
Matthews v. Ward, 350 S.W.2d 500 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “020, where the amount in controversy is less than $2500, must be prosecuted by motion for appeal under the provisions of KRS 21.080 and RCA 1.180. The answer is affirmative.”
United Mine Workers of Am., Dist. No. 23 v. Morris, 307 S.W.2d 763 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “The same is true if the appellant fails to file a motion for appeal required by KRS 21.080. Davis v. Underwood, Ky., 283 S.”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Highways v. Davidson, 383 S.W.2d 346 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “The appeal is here pursuant to KRS 21.080 and RCA 1.180. Appellant presents these points as bases for reversal: (1) The Davidsons are es-topped by the deeds granting right of way; (2) KRS 177.”
Hopwood v. Crowe, 259 S.W.2d 40 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “By the same Act, Section 21.080 was amended so as- to provide that where the amount in controversy is as much as $200, exclusive of interest and' costs, and less than $2,500, an appeal may be prosecuted upon paying the tax and filing the record and entering a motion that the…”
Jewell v. Dell, 284 S.W.2d 92 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “Jewell and Hubbard appeal from the judgment in favor of Gootee and have filed a motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080 from the judgment in favor of the property owners.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.