In order to provide sufficient funds for carrying out the purposes of KRS 212.350 to
212.620, the fiscal court of the county shall annually appropriate money from the general
fund of the county and the legislative body of the city shall annually appropriate money
from the general fund of the city. The appropriations shall be made by the county and the
city in such amounts, in such proportion and upon such terms as the fiscal court and the
legislative body may agree and provide. Moneys so appropriated may be paid over to the
board in regular monthly installments. In the event the sums derived from said
appropriations, together with funds otherwise available from any other source to the
board during any fiscal year, for its necessary expenditures in the maintenance and
operation of said board, exceed its need for such expenditures during such fiscal year, any
such unexpended funds at the end of such fiscal year shall be carried forward by the board
to be used in paying for its operating costs and expenses for the ensuing year. The board
of education in the city and the board of education in the county may make payments to
the board for school health services provided by the board for children of school age,
resident in the city and the county respectively, which shall not be in excess of the cost
thereof.
Effective: June 17, 1954
History: Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 168, sec. 1, effective June 17, 1954. -- Created
1942 Ky. Acts ch. 41, sec. 10.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1948–1953 · leading case:
Henry v. Parrish, 211 S.W.2d 418 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948).
Henry v. Parrish, 211 S.W.2d 418 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948).
· cites it 2× “The finances of the Board are provided by Section 212.470, KRS, which declares: “In order that there may be a fund of not less than $1,000,000 annually to carry out the purposes” of the act, the fiscal court of the county is required to levy annually a tax which will produce a…”
Kesselring v. City of Louisville, 257 S.W.2d 596 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
· cites it 4× “authority of the city to expend the proceeds of the bond issue for the benefit of the board is as clear as its authority to contribute to the board from its general tax levy, as required by KRS 212.470. Finally, it is contended that the levying of taxes for the payment of the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 212.470(1) — 1 case
Kesselring v. City of Louisville, 257 S.W.2d 596 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“authority of the city to expend the proceeds of the bond issue for the benefit of the board is as clear as its authority to contribute to the board from its general tax levy, as required by KRS 212.470. Finally, it is contended that the levying of taxes for the payment of the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 212.470(2) — 1 case
Kesselring v. City of Louisville, 257 S.W.2d 596 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“authority of the city to expend the proceeds of the bond issue for the benefit of the board is as clear as its authority to contribute to the board from its general tax levy, as required by KRS 212.470. Finally, it is contended that the levying of taxes for the payment of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.