Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216.570

Repealed, 1996

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Judicial review of cabinet's decision. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 357, effective July 15, 1996. -- Created 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 157, sec. 15, effective July 15, 1982.

Notes of Decisions
Jones v. Cabinet for Human Resources, Division for Licensure & Regulations (1986) kyctapp · cites it 2× “KRS 216.570 provides for judicial review of the hearing officer’s decision.”
Jenny Wiley Health Care Center v. Commonwealth Cabinet for Human Resources (1992) ky · cites it 2× “Pursuant to KRS 216.570(1) and 900 KAR 2:020, Sec. 2(9), JWHCC filed an appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court, which on April 4, 1990 affirmed the order of the hearing officer.”
Anderson v. Cabinet for Human Resources (1996) kyctapp “A review of the hearing officer’s written decisions does not indicate that Anderson was ever advised of his right to seek judicial review of those decisions pursuant to KRS 216.570(1). Further, it does not appear that the Cabinet attempted to advise him of this right in any…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216.570(1) — 2 cases
Jenny Wiley Health Care Center v. Commonwealth Cabinet for Human Resources (1992) ky “Pursuant to KRS 216.570(1) and 900 KAR 2:020, Sec. 2(9), JWHCC filed an appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court, which on April 4, 1990 affirmed the order of the hearing officer.”
Anderson v. Cabinet for Human Resources (1996) kyctapp “A review of the hearing officer’s written decisions does not indicate that Anderson was ever advised of his right to seek judicial review of those decisions pursuant to KRS 216.570(1). Further, it does not appear that the Cabinet attempted to advise him of this right in any…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216.570(4) — 1 case
Jenny Wiley Health Care Center v. Commonwealth Cabinet for Human Resources (1992) ky “Pursuant to KRS 216.570(1) and 900 KAR 2:020, Sec. 2(9), JWHCC filed an appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court, which on April 4, 1990 affirmed the order of the hearing officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.