Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 235.300 (2026)

Civil liability for negligent operation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The operator of a vessel or motorboat shall be liable for any injury or damage occasioned by the negligent operation of such vessel or motorboat, whether such negligence consists of a violation of the provisions of the statutes of this state or neglecting to observe such ordinary care and operation as the rules of the common law require. Where the owner is not the operator of the vessel or motorboat he shall not be liable for such injury or damage unless such owner is aboard the vessel or motorboat at the time of such injury or damage or unless the operator at such time of injury or damage is operating said boat upon the owner's business or in the course and scope of his employment with the owner. The "Family Purpose Doctrine" as it is applied in the use and operation of automobiles shall be applicable to the use and operation of vessels or motorboats. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to relieve any other person from any liability which he would otherwise have, but nothing contained herein shall be construed to authorize or permit any recovery in excess of injury or damage actually incurred. Effective: March 17, 1960 History: Created 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 68, Art. VIII, sec. 32, effective March 17, 1960.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: Toche v. Am. Watercraft Ass'n, 176 S.W.3d 694 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
Toche v. Am. Watercraft Ass'n, 176 S.W.3d 694 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “” Toche argues that, as to her claims, liability is created by statute, KRS Chapter 235 (“Boats and Boating”), in particular, KRS 235.300, “Civil liability for negligent operation”, which provides: 2 The operator of a vessel or motorboat shall be liable for any injury or damage…”
Griffith v. Kuester, 780 F. Supp. 2d 536 (E.D. Ky. 2011). “§ 235.300, the family purpose doctrine is also “applicable to the use and operation of vessels or motorboats.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.