Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 242.185 (2026)
Repealed, 2013
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Ordinance permitting limited sale of alcoholic beverages by the drink -- Application -- Regulatory fee -- Local option election. History: Repealed 2013 Ky. Acts ch. 121, sec. 105, effective June 25, 2013. -- Amended 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 435, sec. 17, effective July 14, 2000. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 219, sec. 3, effective July 13, 1990. -- Created 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 176, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1988.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2002–2013 · leading case: Liquor Outlet, LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 141 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004).
Liquor Outlet, LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 141 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004). “(6) Any city of the fourth class or county containing a city of the fourth class which has enacted a comprehensive, regulatory ordinance relating to the licensing and operation of hotels, motels, inns, or restaurants for the sale of alcoholic beverages by the drink under KRS…”
Temperance League of Kentucky v. Perry, 74 S.W.3d 730 (Ky. 2002). “The bill, which became effective on July 14, 2000, amends KRS 242.185 by allowing any “dry” city or county to hold a local option election to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages in certain restaurants and dining facilities.”
Pizza Pub of Burnside, Kentucky, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 416 S.W.3d 780 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “010(27)(a) and KRS 242.185(6) for failure to maintain 70% food sales; 2 KRS 243.”
Dalton v. Fortner, 125 S.W.3d 316 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “The circuit court held, and the appellees argue, that subsection (1) of KRS 242.185 precludes the application of KRS 242.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 242.185(1) — 2 cases
Liquor Outlet, LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 141 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004). “(6) Any city of the fourth class or county containing a city of the fourth class which has enacted a comprehensive, regulatory ordinance relating to the licensing and operation of hotels, motels, inns, or restaurants for the sale of alcoholic beverages by the drink under KRS…”
Dalton v. Fortner, 125 S.W.3d 316 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “The circuit court held, and the appellees argue, that subsection (1) of KRS 242.185 precludes the application of KRS 242.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 242.185(3) — 1 case
Liquor Outlet, LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 141 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004). “(6) Any city of the fourth class or county containing a city of the fourth class which has enacted a comprehensive, regulatory ordinance relating to the licensing and operation of hotels, motels, inns, or restaurants for the sale of alcoholic beverages by the drink under KRS…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 242.185(6) — 3 cases
Temperance League of Kentucky v. Perry, 74 S.W.3d 730 (Ky. 2002). “The bill, which became effective on July 14, 2000, amends KRS 242.185 by allowing any “dry” city or county to hold a local option election to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages in certain restaurants and dining facilities.”
Pizza Pub of Burnside, Kentucky, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 416 S.W.3d 780 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “010(27)(a) and KRS 242.185(6) for failure to maintain 70% food sales; 2 KRS 243.”
Dalton v. Fortner, 125 S.W.3d 316 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “The circuit court held, and the appellees argue, that subsection (1) of KRS 242.185 precludes the application of KRS 242.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.