Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 243.590 (2026)
Appeal to Court of Appeals
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any party aggrieved by a judgment of the Circuit Court may appeal to the Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Effective:June 29, 2017 History: Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 81, effective June 29, 2017. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 109. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 104, sec. 15, effective June 16, 1960. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, sec. 58. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2554b-147.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1954–1972 · leading case: Kentucky State Racing Comm'n v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972).
Kentucky State Racing Comm'n v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Upon the appeal the review of the court is limited to *301 determining whether or not (a) the Commission acted without or in excess of its powers; (b) the order appealed from was procured by fraud; (c) if questions of fact are in issue, whether or not any substantial evidence…”
Bartholomew v. Paniello, 287 S.W.2d 616 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “KRS 243.590 authorizes “Any party aggrieved” to appeal to this court in the manner provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure.”
George v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 421 S.W.2d 569 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “560, George appealed to the Franklin Circuit Court which affirmed the order of the Board, and he now prosecutes this appeal as provided by KRS 243.590. At the hearing before the Board, two ABC agents testified that on a Sunday morning they observed the licensed premises of…”
White v. England, 348 S.W.2d 936 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “The statute provides that the mode of bringing a judgment of an inferior court to the Court of Appeals shall be by an appeal taken and perfected in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. KRS 21.056.”
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Coghill, 273 S.W.2d 570 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “Under KRS 243.590 the Board prosecuted .this appeal,1 and the sole question for our determination is whether *571 there was sufficient evidence to support the order of the Board revoking Coghill’s license.”
George v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 403 S.W.2d 24 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “From the order of the circuit court sustaining the Board, appellant took the appeal to this court (under KRS 243.590). 1 Appellees take the position that since Netherland was a necessary party to the original appeal to the circuit court, and was not joined, that appeal was…”
Angel v. Moberly, 425 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “KRS 243.590. We affirm. The appellants, who are among those who protested the issuance of the license, contend that the notice published by the applicant stating his intention to apply for a retail malt beverage license did not com *540 ply with KRS 243.”
Kelly v. Marino, 358 S.W.2d 519 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “The appeal from the Circuit Court to the Court of Appeals must follow procedure under KRS 243.590 and that section is not as broad as the one dealing with an appeal from the Board’s decision where any citizen feeling himself aggrieved may, under KRS 243.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.