Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 25.070 (2026)

Repealed, 1978

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Appeals, docketing and procedure for trial. History: Repealed 1976 (1st. Extra Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January 2, 1978. -- Transferred and amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, sec. 32, from C.C. 726.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1956–1972 · leading case: Rowland v. Miller's Adm'r, 307 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).
Rowland v. Miller's Adm'r, 307 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “Civil' Rule 72.03 expressly declares that all appeals from the county and other inferior courts “shall be tried anew, as if no judgment had been rendered.”
Skinner v. Morrow, 318 S.W.2d 419 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “Her sole contention here is that upon her appeal from the county court to the circuit court she was entitled under KRS 25.070 to a trial de novo, and that the circuit court did not grant her such a trial, but instead ruled that the county court commissioner’s report of…”
Commonwealth v. Devine, 396 S.W.2d 60 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “032), where the cases were jointly tried anew (KRS 25.070) and resulted in a directed verdict and judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence to warrant a conviction on either charge.”
Combs v. Combs, 380 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “KRS 25.070 and CR 72.03 provide that appeals to the circuit court “shall be tried anew, as if no judgment had been rendered.”
White v. Commonwealth ex rel. Feck, 299 S.W.2d 618 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “See KRS 25.070. It requires the execution of a bond “to the effect that the appellant will satisfy and perform the judgment that shall be rendered upon the appeal * * *” (our emphasis) as a condition precedent to taking such appeal.”
White v. Commonwealth, 481 S.W.2d 656 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “KRS 25.070 provides that appeals from police and other courts below the circuit courts shall be taken as required by the Civil Rules or as required by any applicable statute.”
Rabold v. Roberts, 444 S.W.2d 536 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “KRS 25.070 and CR 72.03. The burden of proof was upon Dora.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.