Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271.990 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Penalties. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 274, sec. 165, effective July 1, 1972. -- Repealed and recreated 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec. 2, effective July 1, 1946. History for former KRS 271.990: Repealed 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec. 2, effective July 1, 1946. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 203, 204, 206, 207, 540, 571, 573, 576, 1337, and 1873 Ky. Acts Adj. Sess., ch. 746, sec. 3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1943–1971 · leading case: Commonwealth ex rel. Breckinridge v. Monroe Co., 378 S.W.2d 809 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
Commonwealth ex rel. Breckinridge v. Monroe Co., 378 S.W.2d 809 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 6× “385(2) ; reiterated the allegations made in the original complaint; and further alleged that, having done business in this state while prohibited from so doing, the Monroe Company, and each of its officers, “are subject to the penalties provided for in KRS 271.990 and should be…”
Kentucky Straight Creek Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, 200 S.W.2d 470 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “File in the office of the Secretary of State a designation of the place where the business is to be carried on, where its offices are to be kept, the names and residences of its officers and the name of a person on whom process can be served (KRS Sec.”
Commonwealth v. United Whse. Co., Inc., 169 S.W.2d 300 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). · cites it 2× “See section 271.990, KRS (section 550 of Baldwin’s 1936 Revision of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes) /In the same volume of Corpus Juris, page 1107, Section 3712, the text treats of “misuser” of charter privileges and authorities, and says of it that: “The infliction of the sentence…”
Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Commonwealth, 474 S.W.2d 873 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971). “KRS 271.990 prescribes a penalty in the form of a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000 to be assessed against any corporation that “does business in this state” without complying with the statutory requirements relating to corporations, including those that we have…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.