Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 281
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.665 (2026)

Repealed, 1996

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Grandfathering of certain pre-1954 operations -- Exempted commodities. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 174, sec. 13, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 200, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 5. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 12. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 6. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 20, effective June 15, 1950. Legislative Research Commission Note (7/15/96). Under KRS 446.260, the repeal of this section in 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 174 prevails over its amendment in 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1955–1968 · leading case: Whitaker v. Louisville Transit Co., 274 S.W.2d 391 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Whitaker v. Louisville Transit Co., 274 S.W.2d 391 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 3× “” KRS 281.665 provides: “(1) Any bona fide motor carrier or its successor operating city busses as of December 31, 1949, under a valid certificate, franchise, statute, authorization, or in bona fide operation on said date, shall be entitled to such certificate' or certificates…”
Buechel Bus Co. v. Whitaker, 288 S.W.2d 60 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). · cites it 6× “The appellants urge that the judgment should be reversed and that the Department’s order should be sustained under the “Grandfather Provisions” of the 1950 Motor Transportation Act, KRS 281.665, even though the original Bus Certificate No.”
Lambert Transfer & Storage Co. v. Banner Transfer Co., 315 S.W.2d 629 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “How *630 ever, the 1954 Act also contained a “grandfather clause,” KRS 281.665(4), which provided that any person engaged in the local cartage business as of December 31, 1953, would be entitled to a certificate covering his established operations, “upon application before…”
Combs v. Dave Boster, Inc., 386 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “Under the provisions of KRS 281.665 (7), if the Department ceases to designate a certain commodity as “exempted,” a qualified motor carrier “may be entitled to such authority as will thereafter authorize continuation of the same operation which was being conducted at the time of…”
Hall v. McDuffee Motor Freight, Inc., 427 S.W.2d 231 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “On appeal to this court the Halls contend that under the provisions of KRS 281.665 they are entitled to the broad authority granted them by the commissioner.”
Banner Transfer Co. v. Ockerman, 354 S.W.2d 514 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “188, § 6- Thereafter at the 1958 Session of the General Assembly, subsection (4) of KRS 281.665 was repealed and re-enacted to read as follows: “Any person operating a motor vehicle exclusively engaged in the transportation of property for hire between points within a city or…”
Hollingsworth v. Skaggs Transfer, Inc., 415 S.W.2d 861 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Finally appellant contends he is authorized to render Louisville-Glasgow service by reason of the grandfather clause of KRS 281.665(1), which reads: “Grandfathering of certain pre-1954 operations; exempted commodities.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.665(1) — 1 case
Hollingsworth v. Skaggs Transfer, Inc., 415 S.W.2d 861 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Finally appellant contends he is authorized to render Louisville-Glasgow service by reason of the grandfather clause of KRS 281.665(1), which reads: “Grandfathering of certain pre-1954 operations; exempted commodities.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.665(4) — 1 case
Lambert Transfer & Storage Co. v. Banner Transfer Co., 315 S.W.2d 629 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “How *630 ever, the 1954 Act also contained a “grandfather clause,” KRS 281.665(4), which provided that any person engaged in the local cartage business as of December 31, 1953, would be entitled to a certificate covering his established operations, “upon application before…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.665(7) — 1 case
Combs v. Dave Boster, Inc., 386 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “Under the provisions of KRS 281.665 (7), if the Department ceases to designate a certain commodity as “exempted,” a qualified motor carrier “may be entitled to such authority as will thereafter authorize continuation of the same operation which was being conducted at the time of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.