Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.780 (2026)

Repealed, 2015

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Right of appeal -- How taken. History: Repealed 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 45, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 207, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 74, Art. IV, sec. 20(2). -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 269, sec. 5. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 10. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 17. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 9. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 4. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 43, effective June 15, 1950.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1952–2009 · leading case: Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 3× “Southern thereupon, pursuant to KRS 281.780, appealed this order to the Franklin Circuit Court, designating the Department as the “defendant-appellee”.”

Louisville Transit Co. v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 286 S.W.2d 536 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “Thereafter, Transit prosecuted an appeal from that order to the Franklin Circuit Court under KRS 281.780 and 281.785. While that appeal was’ pending in the Franklin Circuit Court, Transit was confronted with a new union contract which would increase its operating expenses.”

Harris v. Camp Taylor Fire Prot. Dist., 303 S.W.3d 479 (Ky. Ct. App. 2009). “The issue was whether the cost of transcribing the evidence before the Department was to be prorated among the parties according to regulation, or assessed to the losing party according to statute, specifically, KRS 281.780(3), KRS 453.040(l)(a), and CR 54.”

Shockey Tours, Inc. v. Miller Transp., Inc., 984 S.W.2d 95 (Ky. 1998). “Miller appealed under KRS 281.780 challenging in the Franklin Circuit Court the dismissal of the protestants and the grant of operating authority to Shockey, Fisher and Toby.”

Jones v. Webb Transfer Line, Inc., 328 S.W.2d 407 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “A timely appeal was taken to circuit court by the three protestants, appellees herein, in compliance with KRS 281.780. The lower court ruled that the department acted without or in excess of its authority; that the final order was not in conformity with the provisions of KRS…”

Eck Miller Transfer Co. v. Armes, 252 S.W.2d 13 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). · cites it 4× “410 (1948 Edition), to read as it is now worded in KRS 281.780. Subsection (1) (b) of KRS 281.”

Jones v. Meigs, 383 S.W.2d 324 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 3× “Respondent calls our attention to KRS 281.780 which provides for a right of appeal from a ruling of the department.”

Hall v. McDuffee Motor Freight, Inc., 427 S.W.2d 231 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “On appeal to the circuit court (KRS 281.780 and 281.785) this order was set aside and it was held that the commissioner had exceeded his authority.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.780(2) — 1 case

Eck Miller Transfer Co. v. Armes, 252 S.W.2d 13 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “410 (1948 Edition), to read as it is now worded in KRS 281.780. Subsection (1) (b) of KRS 281.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.780(3) — 3 cases

Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “Southern thereupon, pursuant to KRS 281.780, appealed this order to the Franklin Circuit Court, designating the Department as the “defendant-appellee”.”

Jones v. Meigs, 383 S.W.2d 324 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “Respondent calls our attention to KRS 281.780 which provides for a right of appeal from a ruling of the department.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.