Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 304
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 304.020 (2026)

Repealed, 1970

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Seal. History: Repealed 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 301, subtit. 99, sec. 3, effective June 18, 1970. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 21, sec. 1, effective September 1, 1950.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2022 · leading case: Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Richard Tryon, 502 S.W.3d 585 (Ky. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Richard Tryon, 502 S.W.3d 585 (Ky. 2016). · cites it 2× “Because Chaffin relied so heavily on common-law principles and also because there is significant statutory law regulating automobile insurance, that decision is most appropriately limited to the facts of that case.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. United States, 651 F. Supp. 2d 714 (W.D. Ky. 2009). · cites it 2× “KRS § 304.020(17) defines “security” as “any continuing undertaking complying with this subtitle, for payment of tort liabilities, basic reparation benefits, and all other obligations imposed by this subtitle.”
Encompass Indem. Co. v. Richard Tryon (Ky. 2016). “Because Chaffin relied so heavily on common-law principles and also because there is significant statutory law regulating automobile insurance, that decision is most appropriately limited to the facts of that case.”
Tony Shackelton v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “KRS 304.020(2) (emphasis added). Denial of liability never occurred in the instant case either.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 304.020(1) — 2 cases
Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Richard Tryon, 502 S.W.3d 585 (Ky. 2016). “Because Chaffin relied so heavily on common-law principles and also because there is significant statutory law regulating automobile insurance, that decision is most appropriately limited to the facts of that case.”
Encompass Indem. Co. v. Richard Tryon (Ky. 2016). “Because Chaffin relied so heavily on common-law principles and also because there is significant statutory law regulating automobile insurance, that decision is most appropriately limited to the facts of that case.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 304.020(17) — 1 case
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. United States, 651 F. Supp. 2d 714 (W.D. Ky. 2009). “KRS § 304.020(17) defines “security” as “any continuing undertaking complying with this subtitle, for payment of tort liabilities, basic reparation benefits, and all other obligations imposed by this subtitle.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 304.020(2) — 1 case
Tony Shackelton v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “KRS 304.020(2) (emphasis added). Denial of liability never occurred in the instant case either.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.