Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 323.250 (2026)

Injunction

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever in the judgment of the board any person has engaged, or is about to engage, in any acts or practices that constitute, or will constitute, a violation of KRS 323.020 or KRS 323.230, the board may inform the Attorney General, who may make application to the Franklin Circuit Court for an order enjoining such acts or practices, or the board may inform the Commonwealth's attorney of the county in which the acts or practices are occurring or will occur who may make application to the Circuit Court of that county for an order enjoining such acts or practices. Upon a showing by the board that such person has engaged, or is about to engage, in any such acts or practices, an injunction, restraining order, or such other order as may be appropriate shall be granted by such court. Any order of the Franklin Circuit Court shall be enforceable and shall be valid anywhere in this state and the order of either court shall be reviewable as provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure in the case of other injunctions and restraining orders. Effective: July 15, 2002 History: Amended 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 111, sec. 7, effective July 15, 2002. -- Created 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 218, sec. 21, effective June 16, 1960.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1970–1970 · leading case: Dahlem Constr. Co. v. State Bd. of Examiners & Reg. of Architects, 459 S.W.2d 169 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dahlem Constr. Co. v. State Bd. of Examiners & Reg. of Architects, 459 S.W.2d 169 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “The appellee, State Board of Examiners and Registration of Architects of Kentucky, instituted this action pursuant to KRS 323.250 seeking to enjoin alleged illegal practice of architecture and asking for a declaration of rights pursuant to KRS 418.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.