Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.410 (2026)

Determination of insured status -- Notification of worker -- Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The secretary acting through his duly authorized representatives shall, upon request, determine the insured status of a worker. If a worker is found to have fully insured status, as defined in KRS 341.090(3), the Office of Unemployment Insurance shall notify all interested parties. If found to be not fully insured, the division shall notify the worker. The secretary may, at any time, make further determinations as may affect the worker's eligibility for benefits or may set aside, reconsider, modify, or amend a determination at any time on the basis of additional information or to correct a clerical mistake. The secretary may by regulation prescribe what constitutes a determination as used in this section and KRS 341.420(2) and (3). Any further determination made pursuant to this section may be appealed pursuant to KRS 341.420. Effective: June 27, 2019 History: Amended 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 146, sec. 63, effective June 27, 2019. -- Amended 2007 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 3, effective June 26, 2007. -- Amended 2006 Ky. Acts ch. 211, sec. 149, effective July 12, 2006. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 133, sec. 2, effective July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 74, Art. VI, sec. 107(23),(31). -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 21, sec. 28. -- Amended 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 206, sec.

1. -- Amended 1948 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 15. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4748g-11.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1949–1968 · leading case: Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Anaconda Aluminum Co., 433 S.W.2d 119 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968).
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Anaconda Aluminum Co., 433 S.W.2d 119 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “” KRS 341.410 provides in part as follows: “The commissioner acting through his duly authorized representatives shall determine the validity of each claim and, if benefits are allowed, the division shall notify all interested parties.”
Babb v. Bullitt, 220 S.W.2d 394 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “The elimination of the words, as adjudged by the court below, does not affect the Act generally but leaves open the way for procedure pursuant to KRS 341.410 for notice to interested parties with a right to be heard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.