Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 341.460 (2026)

Appeal to Franklin Circuit Court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) In all cases of appeals arising under KRS 341.360(1)(a) or KRS 341.430(2) court review may be had as provided in KRS 341.450 except that review shall be had to the Franklin Circuit Court. (2) A claimant who has been denied benefits under KRS 341.360(1)(a) may appeal for himself and for and on behalf of all other claimants similarly situated within that establishment or other establishments whose claims were denied by reason of the same alleged labor dispute or strike. An employer may appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court from the decision of the commission allowing benefits under KRS 341.360(1)(a) and all the workers in his establishment may be joined in such appeal. History: Amended 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 206, sec. 1. -- Amended 1948 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 18. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4748g-11. Legislative Research Commission Note (6/26/2007). A technical correction has been made in this section to conform with internal renumbering of KRS 341.360 by the Reviser of Statutes under the authority of KRS 7.136.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1963–2022 · leading case: Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Providian Agency Grp., Inc., 981 S.W.2d 138 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998).
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Providian Agency Grp., Inc., 981 S.W.2d 138 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “450 and KRS 341.460. Providian named as defendants in that appeal the Commission and Combs, but not the Division.”
Taylor v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 382 S.W.3d 826 (Ky. 2012). “450(1), which states: (l)Except as provided in KRS 341.460, within twenty (20) days after the date of the decision of the commission, any party aggrieved thereby may, after exhausting his remedies before the commission, secure judicial review thereof by filing a complaint…”
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Carter, 689 S.W.2d 360 (Ky. 1985). “— (1) Except as provided in KRS 341.460, within twenty (20) days after the date of the decision of the commission, any party aggrieved thereby may, after exhausting his remedies before the commission, secure judicial review thereof by filing a complaint against the commission in…”
Pickhart v. United States Post Off., 664 S.W.2d 939 (Ky. Ct. App. 1983). “— (1) Except as provided in KRS 341.460, within twenty (20) days after the date of the decision of the commission, any party aggrieved thereby may, after exhausting his remedies before the commission, secure judicial review thereof by filing a complaint against the commission in…”
Johnson v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 367 S.W.2d 253 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “The Commission denied the claims, and its action was affirmed on a judicial review by the Franklin Circuit Court under KRS 341.460. This appeal followed. Most of the states and territories adopted unemployment insurance statutes contain *255 ing a disqualification for benefits…”
J. T. Nelson Co. v. Comstock, 636 S.W.2d 896 (Ky. Ct. App. 1982). “(5) It shall not be necessary, in any judicial proceeding under this section or KRS 341.460, to have entered exceptions to the rulings of the commission, and no bond shall be required for entering such appeal.”
Ricco Powell v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “450(1), which provides “(1) Except as provided in KRS 341.460, within twenty (20) days after the date of the decision of [KUIC], any party aggrieved thereby may, after exhausting his remedies before [KUIC], secure judicial review thereof by filing a complaint against [KUIC] in…”
Tony Bryant v. Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “450(1), which provides as follows: Except as provided in KRS 341.460, within twenty (20) days after the date of the decision of the commission, any party aggrieved thereby may, after exhausting his remedies before the commission, secure judicial review thereof by filing a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.