Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 342
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.220 (2026)

Oath of Board Members

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each member of the board shall take the oath prescribed by Section 228 of the Constitution. History: Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 78, sec. 33. -- Amended 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 16. -- Amended 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 27, sec. 43. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 4618-112, 4924.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Lydia Addison v. Kevin Addison, 463 S.W.3d 755 (Ky. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lydia Addison v. Kevin Addison, 463 S.W.3d 755 (Ky. 2015). “Lydia contends that the trial court erred, because it did not make findings or conclusions regarding her request for attorney’s fees pursuant to KRS 342.220. The statute provides in relevant part that “[t]he court from time to time after considering the financial resources of…”
Kevin Addison v. Lydia Addison (Ky. 2015). “Lydia contends that the trial court erred, because it did not make findings or conclusions regarding her request for attorney's fees pursuant to KRS 342.220. The statute provides in relevant part that "[t]he court from time to time after considering the financial resources of…”
Lydia Addison v. Kevin Addison (Ky. 2015). “Lydia contends that the trial court erred, because it did not make findings or conclusions regarding her request for attorney's fees pursuant to KRS 342.220. The statute provides in relevant part that "[t]he court from time to time after considering the financial resources of…”
Kevin Addison v. Lydia Addison (Ky. 2015). “Lydia contends that the trial court erred, because it did not make findings or conclusions regarding her request for attorney's fees pursuant to KRS 342.220. The statute provides in relevant part that "[t]he court from time to time after considering the financial resources of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.