Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.010 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Legislative findings -- Citation. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 4, sec. 22. -- Created 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 291, sec. 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: Alexander v. S & M MOTORS, INC., 28 S.W.3d 303 (Ky. 2000).
Alexander v. S & M MOTORS, INC., 28 S.W.3d 303 (Ky. 2000). · cites it 2× “In the complaint she alleged, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation and violation of the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act (KCPA), KRS 367.010 et seq. A jury trial was held concerning these two issues on January 27, 1997.”
Salisbury v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 166 F. Supp. 2d 546 (E.D. Ky. 2001). “§ 367.010 et seq.), (4) conspiracy, (5) breach of express warranty, (6) breach of implied warranty, (7) fraud, (8) unjust enrichment, (9) public nuisance, and (10) medical monitoring.”
Corder v. Ford Motor Co., 869 F. Supp. 2d 835 (W.D. Ky. 2012). · cites it 2× “Corder brought claims on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Ford for damages under the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act (“KCPA”), KRS § 367.010 et seq., restitution, and other equitable and declaratory relief.”
Corder v. Ford Motor Co., 285 F. App'x 226 (6th Cir. 2008). “, brought this action against Ford Motor Company on behalf of himself and others similarly situated seeking damages under the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act (“KCPA”), Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 367.010 et seq., restitution and other equitable and declaratory relief.”
Stewart v. INOAC Grp. North Am., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 2× “Because the allegations under Count VII also reference provisions of the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act, KRS § 367.010, et seq., the Court considers Plaintiff’s claim under that statute.”
Oppong v. Owensboro Health Med. Grp. Inc (W.D. Ky. 2023). “Kentucky Deceptive Trade Practices Act Oppong contends that OHMG violated the Kentucky Deceptive Trade Practices Act, to which he cites KRS 367.010, et seq. The actual name of the Act is the Consumer Protection Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.