Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.200 (2026)

Restoration of property -- Appointment of receiver

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court may make such additional orders or judgments as may be necessary to restore to any person in interest any moneys or property, real or personal, which may have been paid out as a result of any practice declared to be unlawful by KRS 367.130 to 367.300, including the appointment of a receiver or the revocation of a license or certificate authorizing any person to engage in business in the Commonwealth, or both. Effective: July 15, 1986 History: Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 250, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1986. -- Created 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 4, sec. 10.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Kentucky Laborers Dist. Council Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hill & Knowlton, Inc., 24 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. Ky. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kentucky Laborers Dist. Council Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hill & Knowlton, Inc., 24 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. Ky. 1998). · cites it 6× “1981) (“We hold, therefore, that the legislature, in enacting KRS 367.200, intended to vest the Attorney General with the authority to seek restitution on behalf of defrauded consumers.”

Com. Ex Rel. Beshear v. ABAC Pest Control, 621 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 7× “Appellant, the Attorney General, contends that the trial court erred in two respects: first, by determining that KRS 367.200 does not authorize the Attorney General to seek restitution on *706 behalf of the victims of consumer fraud; and second, by adjudging that the president…”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 205 F.R.D. 369 (D.D.C. 2002). “Thirteen states — Alabama, @Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington — have had state and/or federal courts interpret statutory provisions to effectively grant parens patriae authority or have…”

California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “§ 480-14(b); Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 367.200; La.Rev.Stat.”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 62 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 1999). “Kentucky cites one opinion which held that the legislature, in enacting KRS 367.200, intended to grant the State Attorney General authority to seek restitution on behalf of indirect purchasers.”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 99 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999). “See KRS 367.200; Commonwealth of Kentucky ex.”

Anderson v. Old Nat'l Bancorp, 675 F. Supp. 2d 701 (W.D. Ky. 2009). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs argue that the KCPA is broader than this class, citing KRS § 367.200. This provision does not stand for the proposition Plaintiffs cite, rather it “permits a court to order relief for the consumers on whose behalf the Attorney General has successfully brought suit.”

Kiskaden v. LVNV Funding, LLC (In re Kiskaden), 571 B.R. 226 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). “As a remedy for that fraudulent conduct, Count 3 seeks an award of monetary damages and declaratory and injunctive relief. Count 4 alleges that Creditor violated the FDCPA by making false and deceptive statements in the course of its collection activities, including attempting…”

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Marathon Petroleum Co., 191 F. Supp. 3d 694 (2016). · cites it 2× “Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 367.200 (West 2016); Com.”

Connecticut v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (D. Conn. 2025). “1998) (reasoning that Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.200 intended to outline relief in parens patriae actions brought by attorney general); Kentucky v.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.200(1) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.