Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 369
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.106 (2026)

Construction and application of KRS 369.101 to 369.120

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

KRS 369.101 to 369.120 must be construed and applied: (1) To facilitate electronic transactions consistent with other applicable law; (2) To be consistent with reasonable practices concerning electronic transactions and with the continued expansion of those practices; and (3) To effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of KRS 369.101 to 369.120 among states enacting it. Effective: August 1, 2000 History: Created 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 301, sec. 6, effective August 1, 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Tax Recall Petition Comm., Acting by & Through Its Members & Bobbie Holsclaw, in Her Off. Capacity as Jefferson Cnty. Clerk v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. & Jefferson Cnty. Teachers Ass'n, No. 2020 SC 0569 (Ky. June 13, 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tax Recall Petition Comm., Acting by & Through Its Members & Bobbie Holsclaw, in Her Off. Capacity as Jefferson Cnty. Clerk v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. & Jefferson Cnty. Teachers Ass'n, No. 2020 SC 0569 (Ky. June 13, 2022). “21 KRS 369.106(1). 13 the UETA.22 Finally, if another applicable law requires a signature to be verified, “the requirement is satisfied if the electronic signature of the person authorized to perform those acts [verification], together with all other information required to be…”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.106(1): 1 case
Tax Recall Petition Comm., Acting by & Through Its Members & Bobbie Holsclaw, in Her Off. Capacity as Jefferson Cnty. Clerk v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. & Jefferson Cnty. Teachers Ass'n, No. 2020 SC 0569 (Ky. June 13, 2022). “21 KRS 369.106(1). 13 the UETA.22 Finally, if another applicable law requires a signature to be verified, “the requirement is satisfied if the electronic signature of the person authorized to perform those acts [verification], together with all other information required to be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.