Ky. Rev. Stat. § 369.101

Short title for KRS 369.101 to 369.120

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

KRS 369.101 to 369.120 may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. Effective: August 1, 2000 History: Created 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 301, sec. 1, effective August 1, 2000.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2023 · leading case: Riley v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Riley v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB (2009) kyctapp “We note that the Rileys and Flagstar make arguments for and against, respectively, the application of Kentucky’s Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, KRS 369.101 to KRS 369.120, to this ease.”

Tax Recall Petition Committee, Acting by and Through Its Members And Bobbie Holsclaw, in Her Official Capacity as Jeffer (2022) ky · cites it 2× “”14 “The doctrine is especially applicable to acts passed at the same session of the Legislature, and it is frequently said in the opinions that the acts should be construed together, so as to harmonize and effectuate the purpose of the Legislature in the enactment of both.”15…”

Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (2016) wva “§§ 16-1601 to -1620 (2000); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 369.101 - .120 (West 2006 & Supp.”

Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. v. Jenna Kate Fields (2023) kyctapp “Fields’ signature statement reads: 5 KRS 369.101 to 369.120. -5- By electronically clicking “Accept,” I acknowledge that I received a copy of the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate and understand that I am agreeing to arbitrate employment-related claims and waive my right to have…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.