lien waived.
(1) Any contractor, architect or other person who builds, repairs or improves the property of another under such circumstances that a mechanic's or materialman's lien may be imposed on the property shall, from the proceeds of any payment received from the owner, pay in full all persons who have furnished material or performed labor on the property.
(2) If any payment by the owner to the contractor, architect or other person is not sufficient to pay in full all bills for material and labor, then such claims shall be paid on a pro rata basis to the amount of payments received, unless otherwise agreed between the contractor, architect or other person and the holder of the claim for material or labor.
(3) This section shall not apply where persons furnishing material or performing labor have waived in writing their right to file mechanics' or materialmen's liens. Effective: October 1, 1942 History: Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2467b-1, 2467b-2, 2467b-3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
18
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1969–2022 · leading case:
Blanton v. Commonwealth, 562 S.W.2d 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
Blanton v. Commonwealth, 562 S.W.2d 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 11× “The commentary to section 1530 of the final draft stated: An example of property obtained “subject to a known legal obligation” is a contractor or architect who fails to apply payments to claims of mechanic’s or ma-terialman’s liens presently an offense under KRS 376.070. The…”
In Re D & B Elec., Inc., 4 B.R. 263 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1980).
· cites it 3× “Ky.Rev.Stat. § 376.070. 18 . Ky.Rev.Stat.”
Butler v. Weedman (In Re Weedman), 65 B.R. 288 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1986).
· cites it 4× “In support of this position Butler cites KRS 376.070 which provides that: (1) Any contractor, architect or other person who builds, repairs or improves the property of another under such circumstances that a mechanic’s or materi-alman’s lien may be imposed on the property shall,…”
Kentucky ex rel. United Pac. Ins. v. Laurel Cnty., 805 F.2d 628 (6th Cir. 1986).
· cites it 6× “*633 Ky.Rev.Stat. § 376.070 (1972). 5 This statute is found in the chapter relating to “Statutory Liens” and is both preceded and followed by provisions for mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens.”
Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Steel Fabricators, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 51 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 2× “J & D and Vulcraft initially argue that regardless of whether a lien was timely filed, KRS 376.070 guarantees them payment by Wehr: (1) Any contractor, architect or other person who builds, repairs or improves the property of another under such circumstances that a mechanics’ or…”
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Penick (In Re Penick), 199 B.R. 16 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 1996).
“1996), that court addressed the question of whether the Kentucky mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien statute, KRS 376.070, creates a trust so as to allow debts arising in that context to be found to be nondischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(4).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 376.070(1) — 6 cases
Blanton v. Commonwealth, 562 S.W.2d 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“The commentary to section 1530 of the final draft stated: An example of property obtained “subject to a known legal obligation” is a contractor or architect who fails to apply payments to claims of mechanic’s or ma-terialman’s liens presently an offense under KRS 376.070. The…”
Kentucky ex rel. United Pac. Ins. v. Laurel Cnty., 805 F.2d 628 (6th Cir. 1986).
“*633 Ky.Rev.Stat. § 376.070 (1972). 5 This statute is found in the chapter relating to “Statutory Liens” and is both preceded and followed by provisions for mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 376.070(2) — 3 cases
Blanton v. Commonwealth, 562 S.W.2d 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“The commentary to section 1530 of the final draft stated: An example of property obtained “subject to a known legal obligation” is a contractor or architect who fails to apply payments to claims of mechanic’s or ma-terialman’s liens presently an offense under KRS 376.070. The…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 376.070(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.